Rich Ahrens wrote in news:478ea27e$0$27493$804603d3
@auth.newsreader.iphouse.com:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
"Matt W. Barrow" wrote in
:

"Roger (K8RI)" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:26:35 -0600, "Dan Luke"
wrote:

"Matt Whiting" wrote:

And CO2 is a by-product of a warming ocean. Please refute the
following point by point. :-)

http://www.john-daly.com/oceanco2/oceanco2.htm

What's to refute?

"The sensitivity calculation, however, may be very reliable. It
shows
that natural temperature increase cannot be the whole reason for
the
increase of
atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration of about 80 ppm during
this
century.
But the question of the `Chicken and the Egg' *for the ice core
measurements*
seems quite clear: First comes the warming, then comes the CO2. "
That has been historically true, but not this time. Now it's the
CO2
leading the temp.
No, it's not - sorry. Try understanding CO2 forcing action.


A bit lke arguing how big the SPLAT is going to be as you're falling
through space, isn't it?

"I wonder if it will be friends with me?"


Funny you should say that.. I just saw that episode last night.

Sppoky!

Bertie