On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 18:14:00 -0700, "David Brooks"
wrote:

"Ron Rosenfeld" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:17:19 -0700, "David Brooks"

wrote:

If it is "a flight under IFR in
which the controls are, in fact, for at least some of the time,
manipulated
by a pilot who is not IR or not current" then two pilots are required

What regulation requires two pilots under this circumstance?

61.3(e)(1) for the "not IR" option. As I said, I am manufacturing an
artificially rigid definition of the flight to try to figure out if there is
any rationale for logging PIC. Almost a reduction ad absurdum.

-- David Brooks


I don't see 61.3 (e) (1) requiring two pilots in the case where a non-rated
person (or pilot) happens to be manipulating the controls.

The only pilot that is *required* is the one who is acting as PIC.

================
61.3 e) Instrument rating. No person may act as pilot in command of a civil
aircraft under IFR or in weather conditions less than the minimums
prescribed for VFR flight unless that person holds:
(1) The appropriate aircraft category, class, type (if required), and
instrument rating on that person's pilot certificate for any airplane,
helicopter, or powered-lift being flown;
==================


Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA)