View Single Post
  #16  
Old August 30th 18, 06:02 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
John Foster
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 354
Default Hard wax v/s liquid wax (and turbulators)

On Thursday, August 30, 2018 at 8:37:17 AM UTC-6, Tango Whisky wrote:
Le jeudi 30 août 2018 15:59:36 UTC+2, OHM Ω http://aviation.derosaweb.net a écritÂ*:
On Wednesday, August 29, 2018 at 7:20:29 AM UTC-5, Tango Whisky wrote:
Le mercredi 29 août 2018 13:42:25 UTC+2, Martin Gregorie a écritÂ*:

Read up on turbulators. They're not needed on modern airfoils,

Except that ALL modern airfoils use turbulators.


I am pretty certain that on my ASW-27B the only turbulators on the wings are small 2cm wide sections just in front of the underside NACA vents which pressurize the ailerons and flaps. I can only guess at the aerodynamics of the turbulator's purpose here but this might be an example of this particular modern airfoil NOT needing turbulators (per Schleicher at least). ;-)


Turbulators are either zig-zag / dimple tapes (all non-Schleicher), or blow holes (Schleicher). Both do the same job.


Which again comes back to the smoothness of the wing surface as it potentially relates to dimples in a golf ball. With a rough wing surface (from sanding?), would that have the same effect on the surface boundary layer potentially? Would there be a part of the airfoil that would benefit more from such a treatment? And thus, how important to polish the surfaces to a mirror finish?