NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Maxwell luv2^fly99@live.^com wrote in
:
In article pan.2008.06.09.10.24.54.422714
@hail.eris.flonk.meow.all.hail.discordia.meow.flon k.mockery.demon.flon
k
.meow.killer.snot-monsters.from.outer.space, Synthetic Networked
Android Responsible for Killing and Yardwork says...
Hail Eris! On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 07:58:42 -0700, Eris Kallisti
Discordia was laughing at the antics of Max Isn't Well, when they
suddenly burst out in tears:
TransWench says...
I was busily flonking away in talk.politics.guns,
alt.politics.usa.constitution.gun-rights, rec.crafts.metalworking,
misc.survivalism, and alt.usenet.kooks, when The Goddess Eris
Herself suddenly made me reply to ZeD:
On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:44:09 -0700, Max Isn't Well wrote:
Aratzio says...
On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 15:03:51 -0500, in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks, "RD (The Sandman)" got double secret
probation for writing:
Aratzio wrote:
biggus snippus
I don't think there is a right to own an assault weapon.
I don't think you know what an assault weapon is. It is a
media term used to describe *semi* auto military look alikes.
They fire a medium powered round one shot at a time just
like a revolver. Now, if you wish to use the term "assault
rifle" that is an actual term that describes *full* auto
capable weaponry like what is actually used by the military.
Full auto weaponry has been controlled by federal law since
1934. Ownership of full auto is banned in some states. The
media also uses this term incorrectly in describing what are
assault "weapons".
Specific
types of military grade weapons should be tightly
controlled.
They are.....like since 1934.
And demonstrates that controlling specific types of weapons is
legal.
'Legal' but unconstitutional. The second amendment does NOT
specify semi-automatic arms or even small arms.
The purpose of the second amendment being to provide the
citizenry with protection from the government, I an entitled to
any weapon they have.
That's a fact. The anti gun nuts must think they have nothing to
fear from their government.
I'm still waiting for you gun nuts to actually *do something*
about the foaming-at-the-mouth government you now have...At the
rate you're "mobilising", I figure you should be ready to move a
week or two after Way Too ****ing Late.
Why in the world would they do that? The way the situation sits at
the moment, they get to look downright moderate by comparison.
Well, the ones who're still totally co-opted by BushCo, I wouldn't
see getting in on that action, no, but not all of them _are_, going
by what some of them have said. But it appears even the moderate
pro-gun advocates would rather play politics with those they see as
opposing them, rather than making so much as an attempt to go after
the ones who're turning the US into one big corporation.
Engulf & Devour, Inc?
I worked for them back in the 70's
We know.
Bertie
|