Now, git, troll.

Here's the thread that got the lying inbred cracker dripping:


1 Splat! Sep 24, 2003
\-2 Ken Sandyeggo Sep 24, 2003
\-3 Larry Smith Sep 29, 2003
\-4 Ken Sandyeggo Sep 30, 2003
|-5 Barnyard BOb -- Oct 1, 2003
\-6 Larry Smith Oct 1, 2003




And here, his lies are exposed, making him vewy angwy.

From: Larry Smith )
Subject: Liability after sale
View: Complete Thread (7 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: rec.aviation.homebuilt
Date: 2003-09-29 09:23:56 PST


Hyperbole, lawyerphobia, invective, and hysterical spewage: Kenny, did
you get tagged in court for failure to exercise personal responsibility?




Inbred Cracker: Save the $300. Whatever the lawyer comes up is worthless
and
generally invalid.

Answer:*That must be the reason why you see so many RV's, Skybolts, and
Lancairs
for sale in Trade-a-Plane.

*Now put the minutiae where your mouth is. Give examples. Elucidate,
elaborate, and enlarge on these unconstrained remarks.

[You will notice that he didn't elaborate or give examples; he went on a
trailer trash tirade.]


Inbred Cracker: Can you get the buyer's kids, wife, mother, father
and down to the cousin thrice removed to sign it?

Answer: *A married seller's ma and pa are not his heirs at law. Nor his
cousins,
but maybe your cousins are your brothers and sisters?

*I knew where there was a case against a seller, but they didn't file it
because property was in his name with his wife. Sorry to disappoint you.


Inbred Cracker: They're the ones
that are going to sue if the buyer takes a dirt nap.

Answer: *Cute understatement from a frustrated overstater, but no. A suit
might be
filed if the defendant is wealthy. But then when is the last one we've
heard of since John Denver's mama sued over that defective fuel valve? Don
't bring up the kook in Florida. His case was an aberration by a freak.
[.]

"Splat!" wrote in message
news:kBecb.11244$I36.10585@pd7tw3no...
Add $300 to the purchase price,
and use that to pay the aviation lawyer to handle the sale,
and protect your uncle's ass.

But poor you !
You have unwittingly posted a picture to this NG,
and will probably be scolded by Ronny !

Splat!
"Franklin Breeden" wrote in message
news:0x6cb.418933$Oz4.210348@rwcrnsc54...
I have an uncle who worked for North American Rockwell for almost 50
years. In the early 70s he build a gyrocopter, picture attached, and
over the years flew it for 1500 hours. He was an instructor in it and
president of a gyro club in the LAX area. Anyway, he is now 80 and in
failing health. I saw him and the gyrocopter last month while visiting
in Carson City, NV. The issue is he would like to sell the machine but
is concerned about liability. Aircraft and auto companies are always
getting sued about design flaws. Since he built this machine himself he
is concerned that his estate could be lost in a law suit. As you can
see, the machine has an N number as an experimental aircraft. One FAA
guy said that since it is experimental there should be no liability for
him. Other FAA guys have no idea. My uncle has drafted a letter for a
buyer to sign releasing my uncle of all liability and requiring the
buyer to agree to obtain training in gyros.

As I see it, if a buyer signs the agreement it should be valid. I
realize this is really a legal question. The only other option is to
disassemble the machine, unregistered it, and let the buyer reassemble
and register it. Would anyone have any thoughts about this matter or
possibly other recommendations?
--