On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 22:31:02 +0100, Paul J. Adam wrote:

No, it's cheaper and easier to maintain than the F/A-22.

Pretty much anything's cheaper than the F/A-22. I wonder if it costs
more than its weight in gold.

(Notice the
hasty redesignation? This aircraft can carry two 1000lb bombs, it's a
mighty attack platform!

Indeed. Maybe it fooled a few congressmen.

--
A: top posting

Q: what's the most annoying thing about Usenet?