View Single Post
  #23  
Old December 1st 03, 04:03 AM
phil hunt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 23:39:24 GMT, Scott Ferrin wrote:
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 18:04:18 -0500, machf
wrote:

On 30 Nov 2003 20:43:58 GMT, (ArtKramr) wrote:

I'll start that one off with the P-39 Aircobra. Any more?

Would the F-22 fit in this category, or is it too early to tell yet?


Definitely not. It's met or exceeding all of it's requirements.
Unless that's how *you* define a loser.


It's far too early to tell.

You don't know any more than I do the circumstances under which it
sees action. In 10 or 20 years time, technology will certainly have
advanced: it may be that the F-22 is seen as a wonder weapon, or it
may be seen as technically accomplished but obsolete, like the
Yamato.

--
"It's easier to find people online who openly support the KKK than
people who openly support the RIAA" -- comment on Wikipedia
(Email: , but first subtract 275 and reverse
the last two letters).