Do not deny the morale of self-Zong
relative Xiaodong
for 10 annuals with the Danone joint venture, Zong must now regret. This is quite good by affair entrepreneurs in official negotiations with Danone in the aboriginal signed a joint venture agreement have forgotten an momentous rule that the joint venture agreement to accept each additional in terms of controlling the same time, the reverse should be leap by the terms of the implementation of anti-control of Danone.
such for 1996 baby Haha and Danone, Hong Kong Peregrine coupler attempt joint venture enterprise, its shares only accounted for 49%, when Danone and Peregrine, while a 51% controlling stake in a qualitative alteration in the determination sensitive digital Zong did not really cause the watchful, so apt be competent to reach always of Peregrine emulating the donation of the shares began to guess that this namely a conspiracy Danone yet preset.
if it was clear that the joint venture permission and set the passive position.
shouting for the Danone Wahaha dispute in the killer, case in point mm ;, Wahaha likewise if you had a s, Mengniu, Guangming and additional companies constitute investment behavior have long been unauthorized.
now appears, Wahaha and Danone joint adventure approval signed onward the existence of many problems and loopholes, merely if the accused solo tin set set up is slightly was far-fetched, even to set up set up set up the objective, then this is because Zong errors reasoned at their own subjective of course, this inquiry is only the author's hindsight, but it exposed the Wahaha is a coupler venture with Wahaha trademark ownership, or just have a period of phase of trademark rights? for ownership of the Wahaha trademark, the truth of 1 agreement among the ministry of the law hat present to be resolved, yet the answer now is, regardless of protocol How, Zong are now performed on the 10-year-old agreement had reproofs, and advocates the amendment of the national crowded terms, if the stalemate, which next ruled that the law requires, of course, does not rule out the 2 sides approached a concession may be.
tin infer, Zong regret that not only is not reached in the joint venture agreement can be implemented ashore the anti-control, more joint venture itself, along to Zong's explanation, the original joint venture with Danone does not live go aboard, but for accelerated mutation absences, but also responsive to citizen market for technology policy guidance, but today only to detect, trouble, in fact, this variety of trouble is rooted Zong brand of self-control intricate, and this is precisely have to be affirmed.
However, a rule and law for the criterion point then renounce Zong still rampant, of course, Zong must also be a joint venture negotiations for their own blunders to expenditure the amount, but if we look surrounding Danone in China, industrial layout, could not help but suck down a cold knob mm Mengniu, Huiyuan, light, is warmly and numerous other well-known companies have yet infiltrated the king strength of Danone, the fierce competition in the rear of many brands, Danone is just favor a chess main noiselessly layout.
From this attitude, Zong likewise melodrama the ethnic card Well, affective card worth saying, should no so affable be rules and laws of the stick hit mm bullying, do not they have even the law of the forest still rules immediately alternatively what? you comprehend, the rule has forever been the product of the contradictions and skirmishes, and apt ready-made rules to abandon and disallow the struggle of the feeble and the muscular are none surplus than sitting in a seat. Zong even now the statute unreasonable, anyhow we ought respect and support his independent spirit, as that is what the jot stands for independent fundamental.