Thread
:
Why not use the F-22 to replace the F/A-18 and F-14?
View Single Post
#
20
February 22nd 04, 06:53 PM
Chad Irby
external usenet poster
Posts: n/a
In article ,
(Peter Stickney) wrote:
In article ,
R. David Steele writes:
From what I have read, the C-17 should be cost effective. After
all the design costs are already paid for. And it is far less
expensive to run than the C-5.
But it it more cost-effective than the Il-76s and An-224s that are
already in the market? Those have been already built & paid for.
....and flown hard, and badly maintained...
--
cirby at cfl.rr.com
Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations.
Slam on brakes accordingly.
Chad Irby