View Single Post
  #6  
Old July 15th 04, 02:50 PM
Bill Denton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

But it would probably be a good idea to give your insurance policy a
thorough read before you use any non-standard parts.

It may be just a rinky-dink arm rest bracket, but if your policy calls for
original factory equipment they can refuse to pay, even if the part in no
way contributed to the accident or subsequent damages.


"Jim Weir" wrote in message
...
Having said that, the FAR police are not about to come out and see that

you've
fabricated a bracket or panel out of aluminum to replace a cracked plastic
panel. Me? I'd stay away from titanium and make it all out of aluminum

just to
keep the odd inspector out of the picture. They understand aluminum.

They
don't have a freakin' CLUE about titanium.

Do NOT, under ANY circumstances allow yourself to be drawn into the
337-FSDO-Engineering paperwork nightmare. Do it, be safe, and be happy.

Jim




Bill Zaleski
shared these priceless pearls of wisdom:

-The FAR's do NOT specify "equivelant or better". Owner produced parts
-must conform to the original specifications and production processes.
-You are not allowed to make an aircraft part "better" unless you
-obtain an STC or field approval. Owner produced parts do not require
-a 337, as they are not major repairs or alterations.



Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup)
VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor
http://www.rst-engr.com