Anyone ready for some more war for Israel as CBS News had a segment
(can watch video of such via
www.cbsnews.com) about a US Naval build-up
off the coast of Iran and in the Persian Gulf to warn Iran.. The Jewish
JINSA/PNAC Neocons via Cheney's office are itching to have more
Americans die for Israel by attacking Iran next for Israel...
IRAN: THE NEXT WAR FOR ISRAEL:
http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/zone0...ic.php?t=49800
http://nomorewarforisrael.blogspot.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.israpundit.com/2006/?p=3550
US or Israel will attack Iran by March
By Ted Belman
Likud MK, Yuval Steinitz, states he is
'convinced United States will attack and save the world.'
"No elections will change the nature of the Palestinian Authority as
a terrorist entity and a systematic agreement violator. Israel must
disband the PA, at least in Judea and Samaria, as a preliminary move
ahead of the future need to deal with the Iranian threat."
There is more here than meets the eye.
To disband the PA is to abrogate Oslo. To abrogate Oslo is to end the
"peace" process. I am all for it and for that matter for the
annexation of Judea and Samaria.
But what about attacking Iran?
We know that it is in the interest of both the US and Israel that Hamas
and Hezbollah be destroyed. So why the ceasefires in Lebanon and Gaza.
Ultimately Hezbollah and Gaza will be attacked by Israel and utterly
destroyed. The causus belli will either be rocket attacks or arms build
up. Steinitz suggests the PA will also be destroyed.
The US demanded a ceasefire in Gaza knowing it would be a short term
thing. They just wanted an up tick in atmosphere for Bush's trip to
Amman and Cheney's trip to Saudi Arabia. There is no peace process
now, only a war process.
The Baker report fall on its face. The US is talking of increasing its
troops in Iraq by 30,000. Giuliani and McCain, both presidential
candidates, are looking for victory. The cut and run Democrats have
gone silent. Could it be that the deployment of another 30,000 troops
is really in preparation for an upcoming attack on Iran.
And don't forget the huge build up of an American armada in the
Persian Gulf and a European one off Lebanon. The March to War: Naval
build-up in the Persian Gulf and the Eastern Mediterranean.
Olmert has been talking with Saudi Arabia. Do you think that is about
war or peace? In an AP article, Saudi will intervene in Iraq if US
withdraws it reported,
"...or the Saudi king "may decide to strangle Iranian funding of
the militias through oil policy. If Saudi Arabia boosted production and
cut the price of oil in half ... it would be devastating to Iran ...
The result would be to limit Tehran's ability to continue funnelling
hundreds of millions each year to Shi'ite militias in Iraq and
elsewhere."
BINGO. Pay attention. Not to mention limiting its ability to develope
nuclear weapons.
I recenty asked, Can the US defend the Siniori government. After noting
Secretary Rice's very strong warnings to Syria, I argued,
"That's really strong language. I worry though that she is speaking
big and carrying a soft stick. With no boots on the ground how can she
defend Lebanon. Nothing but bombing Syria would suffice or perhaps
giving Israel the green light to finish Hezbollah off.
If the US is prepared to do this then it means that the US is not
abandoning the ME. It will stand by Lebanon, Jordan and Israel. It will
ensure that Iraq is "an ally in the war on terror."
This phrase "an ally in the war on terror", has recently been added
to all Bush's remarks about what he forsees for Iraq.
Look for Israel to take out Hezbollah and Hamas and the US to take out
Iran's oil distribution terminals preventing them from exporting oil.
Saudi Arabia will make up the short fall. March is the target date.
You heard it all here first.
Posted by Ted Belman @ 11:31 pm |