"Javier Henderson" wrote in message
...
[...]
You're reaching too far. This is a boneheaded policy, period.

And, why are you suggesting that the FSDO should second guess (in
advance!)
the DE? That's the last thing we need, more intromision. There's plenty
as it is

Wow. Even after Highflyer's post, people still think Michael's being
completely serious.

IMHO, it's pretty obvious he's taking the FSDO's side for the sake of making
obvious the problems with their position. Anyone who'd read any of
Michael's other posts would not make the mistake of thinking he's actually
in favor of the FSDO wielding such broad control over the judgments of
others.

Pete