They do follow their rules on 61.57. The only change has
been to tighten up on the content of an IPC [and the name
change].


"Gary Drescher" wrote in message
. ..
| "Jim Macklin" wrote
in message
| news:lKIJg.6515$SZ3.5920@dukeread04...
| Since you seem to think that the regulations need to be
| re-written.
|
| No, I never said that. If anything, I think it would make
slightly more
| sense for the FAA to keep the existing wording and adhere
to it. But I don't
| think it matters much either way.
|
| --Gary
|
|
| "Gary Drescher" wrote in
message
| . ..
| | "Jim Macklin"
wrote
| in message
| | news:L6GJg.6502$SZ3.992@dukeread04...
| | Then I suggest that you write the FAA and your
| congressman
| | to require that the FAA clarify, in the regulations,
| what
| | has been the regulation, policy and interpretation
of
| FAR
| | 61.57, so that you're pleased with the resulting
text.
| | Understand that nothing will change, just an
expenditure
| of
| | a few $100,000 for public hearings, and printing.
| |
| | Right, so why would I bother to make that request? Why
do
| you suggest it?
| |
| | --Gary
| |
| |
|
|
|
|