"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
...
On Apr 18, 6:06 pm, "Mike" nospam @ aol.com wrote:

How soon you forget about the right wing heroes, Timmy McVeigh who
actually
did manage to blow things up and kill women and children, or David
Koresh
who tried to build his own private army and torched his own followers,
Eric
Rudolph who bombed the Olympics among other things, or more recently
Richard
Poplawski, who killed 3 police officers. So now you wingnuts want to get
your panties in a wad because the administration identifies some fringe
nuts
as if there isn't precedent for some of them going off the
farm?http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/ar...2/12natsec.htm

Not sure what your point is. None of these guys worked in the
administration. The subject here is a presidential administration
claiming that those that oppose is views may be terrorist. Try to keep
up here.

Are you high?

WTF does it matter if they "worked in the administration"?

I'm not sure what you've been smoking, but I am pretty sure I don't really
care to "keep up" with your nonsense.

My "point" was that there's plenty of valid reasons for the DHS report,
which makes pretty much all of the rest of the wingnut rants impotent (as if
they ever had a chance of being valid anyway).

Now if you had actually read the DHS report (and clearly you haven't), you'd
know it didn't simply name those that "oppose" their views. It was
Rightwing extremist groups that are hate-oriented towards religious, racial,
or ethnic groups. Perhaps you think that all who oppose the current
administration fit into that category, no?

Try and take your own advice.