Thread
:
How Beat The High Cost Of Fuel: The ElectraFlyer-C
View Single Post
#
27
June 24th 08, 01:57 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
Posts: 3,953
How Beat The High Cost Of Fuel: The ElectraFlyer-C
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:35:03 GMT,
wrote in
:
Larry Dighera wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:15:03 GMT,
wrote in
:
Except they can't as battery technology is an order of magnitude short
on energy density to be able to do it.
I've always thought that the energy stored in metallic aluminum might
be harnessed for motive power. If you look at it on the energy
density chart http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_density, it would
appear to be a reasonable energy source.
Storage type Energy density Energy density
by mass (MJ/kg) by volume (MJ/L)
----------------------------------------------------------
Gasoline[7] 46.9 34.6
Aluminum (burned in air) 31.0 83.8
Hydrazine (toxic) 19.5 19.3
combusted to N2+H2O
So while aluminum isn't as rich an energy source pound-for-pound as
gasoline, it is significantly better than rocket fuel.
Well yeah, except it takes huge amounts of energy to make metallic
aluminum from ore in the first place
Right.
http://electrochem.cwru.edu/ed/encyc...a01-al-prod.ht
It takes about 225 KWH to produce 50 lbs of metallic aluminum.
All the energy that went into making the alumna into metallic aluminum
is just waiting to power an IC engine. Grind the Al into a fine dust
and blow it into the cylinders. :-)
and burning aluminum is not something you really want to be around.
Can you tell me more about that?
Larry Dighera
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by Larry Dighera
Find all threads started by Larry Dighera