View Single Post
  #25  
Old December 16th 04, 02:16 PM
Gary Drescher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

wrote in message
...
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 14:24:26 -0000, "Chris" wrote:

No I am not suggesting that but the practice is not recommended by the FAA
as per the examiners handbook;


Would this be parsed as (1) "not recommended" by the FAA, or (2) not
"recommended by the FAA"?


Those parsings strike me as identical. It would be different to say "advised
against" by the FAA. (Sometimes, people water down "advised against" by
saying "not recommended" instead, leaving themselves room to retreat if
challenged. But that usage, too, could apply to both parsings.)

--Gary