Thread: Why 4130 tube?
View Single Post
  #14  
Old March 19th 04, 06:38 AM
Del Rawlins
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In Ron Webb wrote:

Lessee...20 pounds heavier, but not as brittle or corrosive...cheaper
to acquire, and easier to work with...


There is no difference between mild steel and 4130 as far as corrosion
resistance is concerned, and in a traditional welded tube aircraft
structure any increase in brittleness is going to be a non-issue. If
you hit something hard enough to break (not just bend) it, you probably
wouldn't have survived anyway. I've flown in an aircraft with a 4130
tube fuselage that was rebuilt following a stall/incipient spin incident
from (very) low altitude. Some tubes were bent but as I recall nothing
actually separated. Pilot and passenger both walked away.

----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins-
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/