View Single Post
  #5  
Old December 31st 03, 11:00 PM
Bill Phillips
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...
60 years of hindsight with some revisionism thrown in have obscured the
original intent of attacking an enemy from the air. I only flew one (of

50)
mission
over cloud cover using GEE. We didn't call it area bombing. We didn't call

it
blind bombing. Those are words are now used to stake out an agenda against
bombing in general. We flew the mission because it had to be flown and GEE

was
the only way to get it done. And there was a war on. A very nasty

unpleasant
war.
The name of the game was to go for the enemies throat.


The problem is: were you going for the enemy's throat?

Beating the enemy's fist with your face is not a good way to win.

Hit him night and day
in good weather and bad with no let up and no relief. We flew the

missions,
came back, buried our dead and went out again.We always hit a specific

target
that had to be hit. .The idea of having the enemy hit us without our

hitting
back any way we could was unthinkable. It shows weakness and gives the
inititive to the enemy, and once you have lost the initiative, you have

lost
the war.


Quite agree, however, your return blows have to be effective.

Also doing the same thing again and again is not gaining the initiative, it
is surrendering it.