If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
twin tail questions
On Mon, 04 Aug 2003 18:13:25 +0000, Chris W wrote:
I got such a good answer on my question about flap design I thought I would ask another design question. why would a plane that has two engines have two vertical stabilizers. No in the case of the Aircoupe I always thought the reason for the twin tail was so that the helical prop wash wouldn't induce a yaw tendency from the prop wash hitting the vertical stabilizer/rudder. It is my understanding that the Aircoupe was designed so you wouldn't need rudder pedals, and the twin tail I think would have helped that. But on a twin engine, what's the point? having two vertical stabilizers and two rudders seems significantly more complicated both structurally and mechanically so why do it if there isn't some advantage? There must be one I don't know about. -- Chris Woodhouse Planes may have multiple vertical stabs for several different reasons. Some (e.g. the Lockheed Constellation) may have them to facilitate fitting them in existing hangars without hitting the top of the door opening. Some multiple engine designs have multiple vertical tails so that one portion is directly in the prop wash of the operating engine which may help reduce the minimum control speed following an engine failure. At least that is what Kelly Johnson says about the twin vertical tails of the first Lockheed Electra (More Than My Share of it All, Kelly Johnson, pg. 24). And he says that they also acted as end plates on the horizontal tail, which increased its effectiveness, and improved the static longitudinal stability - same book, same page). -- Kevin Horton RV-8 (finishing kit) Ottawa, Canada http://go.phpwebhosting.com/~khorton/rv8/ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Chris W" wrote in message ... I got such a good answer on my question about flap design I thought I would ask another design question. why would a plane that has two engines have two vertical stabilizers. No in the case of the Aircoupe I always thought the reason for the twin tail was so that the helical prop wash wouldn't induce a yaw tendency from the prop wash hitting the vertical stabilizer/rudder. It is my understanding that the Aircoupe was designed so you wouldn't need rudder pedals, and the twin tail I think would have helped that. But on a twin engine, what's the point? having two vertical stabilizers and two rudders seems significantly more complicated both structurally and mechanically so why do it if there isn't some advantage? There must be one I don't know about. -- Chris Woodhouse There used to be an argument that, in the event of an engine failure, a twin-tail twin would have one fin and rudder directly behind the operating engine, in the prop wash, where it would be more effective. The more likely reason that the '30s and '40's saw a number of twin and triple tail aircraft had to do with the low vertical clearance of hangar doors. A multi-vertical tail aircraft would more likely be able to pass through the low door opening where a single tail would have to be much higher and have to be left outside. Bill Daniels |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
So why did the P-38 have a twin tail. I think it is a pretty cool
looking bird. I think the bird the "Doolittle Raiders" flew had a twin tail too. Fred Chris W wrote: I got such a good answer on my question about flap design I thought I would ask another design question. why would a plane that has two engines have two vertical stabilizers. No in the case of the Aircoupe I always thought the reason for the twin tail was so that the helical prop wash wouldn't induce a yaw tendency from the prop wash hitting the vertical stabilizer/rudder. It is my understanding that the Aircoupe was designed so you wouldn't need rudder pedals, and the twin tail I think would have helped that. But on a twin engine, what's the point? having two vertical stabilizers and two rudders seems significantly more complicated both structurally and mechanically so why do it if there isn't some advantage? There must be one I don't know about. -- Chris Woodhouse 3147 SW 127th St. Oklahoma City, OK 73170 405-691-5206 N35° 20.492' W97° 34.342' "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Historical Review of Pennsylvania |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Frederick Wilson" wrote in message et... So why did the P-38 have a twin tail. I think it is a pretty cool looking bird. I think the bird the "Doolittle Raiders" flew had a twin tail too. Fred The Doolittle raiders flew B-25's, and yes, they had twin tails. I was not in the head of the designers of the P-38, but as it ended up, there are a few reasons that they ended up with twin booms (different than most other twin tails of the time). In the P-38, everything went towards speed and low drag. They made as skinny frontal profile as possible. To get lots of HP, thery also wanted it turbo (or was it super) charged. They put the intercooler (and perhaps the turbocharger) back behind the engine, and it made it so long, they must have figured they were halfway back to the tailplane, so why not contine it, and connect to the tail, and leave off the fuselage. Works for me! G -- ---Jim in NC--- |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Barnyard BOb --" wrote in message ... Morgans wrote: So why did the P-38 have a twin tail. I think it is a pretty cool looking bird. I think the bird the "Doolittle Raiders" flew had a twin tail too. Fred The Doolittle raiders flew B-25's, and yes, they had twin tails. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Bzzzzzt. B-25's have TWIN RUDDERS, not twin tails. If you do not agree... The Ercoupe, C-45 and C-60 have twin tails, too. Barnyard BOb - there is a difference ***************************** Bzzzzzt. They have more than twin rudders. Last I looked, they had twin vertical stabilizers, too. It all depends how picky you want to get. In one since, the P-38 does not have twin tails, either. Since the horizontal is connected to both tail booms, it could be called a Siameese twin tail.(I know that is spelled wrong, but I am in bed recovering from surgery, and am not getting up to look it up) In the end, I will say that the Ercoupe and C-45 and many others have twin tails, too. g -- ---Jim in NC--- |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Barnyard BOb -- wrote in message . ..
"Morgans" post/the/group.here.net wrote: Bzzzzzt. They have more than twin rudders. Last I looked, they had twin vertical stabilizers, too. It all depends how picky you want to get. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Don't ever call me "picky" ! Pedantic perhaps?, also I would tend to define the referred to twin tails as semi-twin empennages since they do share a single horizontal elevator and stabilizer...so there! Ed Sullivan, old enough to be anything I want to be. PETTY is more like it. ====== PICKY - Excessively meticulous; fussy. PETTY - 1.Of small importance; trivial: a petty grievance. 2.Marked by narrowness of mind, ideas, or views. 3.Marked by meanness or lack of generosity, especially in trifling matters. Barnyard BOb - |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
BOb
Here we go again. Disagree/agree but no cussing G Your right, the B-25 had two of those wiggly things (called rudders). They also had two verticl stablizers just ahead of the rudders that did not move. Your going to confuse some of these young scallywags with your termonoligy G Big John On Tue, 05 Aug 2003 09:04:41 -0500, Barnyard BOb -- wrote: Morgans wrote: So why did the P-38 have a twin tail. I think it is a pretty cool looking bird. I think the bird the "Doolittle Raiders" flew had a twin tail too. Fred The Doolittle raiders flew B-25's, and yes, they had twin tails. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Bzzzzzt. B-25's have TWIN RUDDERS, not twin tails. If you do not agree... The Ercoupe, C-45 and C-60 have twin tails, too. Barnyard BOb - there is a difference |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Big John wrote: Your right, the B-25 had two of those wiggly things (called rudders). They also had two verticl stablizers just ahead of the rudders that did not move. Your going to confuse some of these young scallywags with your termonoligy G Big John So what are they if they are on something like an F-15 or F-18? Bernadette |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Your right, the B-25 had two of those wiggly things
You have to careful of using technical terminology like that. I have seen twin wiggly things in mony aircraft, but enough about my wife. Rumour has it the USAF got rid of the C-121 Constelation because the newer pilots couldn't handle 3 pieces of tail at the same time. Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
BernadetteTS wrote in message ...
In article , Big John wrote: Your right, the B-25 had two of those wiggly things (called rudders). They also had two verticl stablizers just ahead of the rudders that did not move. Your going to confuse some of these young scallywags with your termonoligy G Big John So what are they if they are on something like an F-15 or F-18? Bernadette They're not "homebuilt," so no one here will probably care :) Ken J. - Sandy, Egg Ho |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pitts questions | Wendy | Aerobatics | 7 | February 13th 04 03:48 AM |
Accelerated spin questions | John Harper | Aerobatics | 7 | August 15th 03 07:08 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 4 | August 7th 03 05:12 AM |
Oshkosh Get together Roster - Sign in, please! | Bruce E. Butts | Home Built | 4 | July 26th 03 11:34 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 04:50 PM |