![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/5/2015 7:50 PM, Byker wrote:
Cosford 2008. Ri©ardo -- Moving Things In Still Pictures |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/5/2015 9:09 PM, Charles Lindbergh wrote:
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 20:59:00 +0100, Ri©ardo wrote: On 8/5/2015 7:50 PM, Byker wrote: Cosford 2008. Wasn't this puppy considered one of Britain's worst aeronautical engineering disasters? No worse than many others throughout the world. At least it flew. -- Moving Things In Still Pictures |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ri©ardo" wrote in message
... At least it flew. A 300 mph takeoff speed and burning up nearly 3/4 of its fuel just to reach altitude didn't help. Its longest flight was less than an hour. This is the only flight footage I've been able to find: http://www.britishpathe.com/video/two-planes-make-news Still, it made an impression on toy manufacturers: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LEcVdwWdIQw |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Charles Lindbergh" wrote in message
... Wasn't this puppy considered one of Britain's worst aeronautical engineering disasters? In terms of money lost, I can think of Bristol Brabazon: Ā£12M (1949 costs) ā Ā£350M (2012 inflation adjusted cost) SARO Princess: Ā£10M (1952) for three aircraft http://www.fzt.haw-hamburg.de/pers/S...R_Princess.pdf R101 Airship: Ā£711,595 (1930) None of these entered airline service. In a way, the DeHavilland Comet (1949) was an engineering failure, but it bounced back from its explosive decompression problems and the Comet 4 series which debuted in 1958 had a productive career of over 30 years. You also might want to check out: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catego...E2%80% 931959 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/5/2015 10:28 PM, Byker wrote:
"Ri©ardo" wrote in message ... At least it flew. A 300 mph takeoff speed and burning up nearly 3/4 of its fuel just to reach altitude didn't help. Its longest flight was less than an hour. This is the only flight footage I've been able to find: http://www.britishpathe.com/video/two-planes-make-news Still, it made an impression on toy manufacturers: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LEcVdwWdIQw Ah, if there's money to be made... :-) -- Moving Things In Still Pictures |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UK2 XF926 Bristol 188.jpg | Joseph Testagrose | Aviation Photos | 0 | June 1st 15 01:28 PM |
UK2 XE286 Bristol 173.jpg | Joseph Testagrose | Aviation Photos | 1 | May 5th 15 07:25 PM |
UK1 F4500 Bristol F2B.jpg | Joseph Testagrose | Aviation Photos | 0 | September 27th 12 06:33 AM |
UK1 D2222 Bristol F2B.jpg | Joseph Testagrose | Aviation Photos | 1 | March 26th 11 12:04 PM |
The Old Ones Are The Best Ones - Bristol F2b.jpg (1/1) | Mitchell Holman | Aviation Photos | 0 | June 10th 07 01:30 PM |