![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Delta announced today it will lose another 1 Billion dollars in 2005
Most of the US Airlines are losing money due to higher fuel cost's In Europe, airlines are making money and the fuel is 3 times more expensive. I don't get it. Is it some new type of math the US airlines are using or have they become bloated Politically Correct business model disasters due to PC hiring practices and employee perks? Or are they looking for a tax payer bailout for their inefficient business operations? Just curious |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Peterpan wrote: I don't get it. Is it some new type of math the US airlines are using or have they become bloated Politically Correct business model disasters due to PC hiring practices and employee perks? Nobody knows. If they did, Delta would take the steps needed to get out of the red. George Patterson Drink up, Socrates -- it's all-natural. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peterpan" wrote in message .. . Delta announced today it will lose another 1 Billion dollars in 2005 Most of the US Airlines are losing money due to higher fuel cost's In Europe, airlines are making money and the fuel is 3 times more expensive. The airlines don't pay pump prices; something like $1/gal is what they pay now, last I heard. I kind of doubt the European airlines are paying $3-4/gal. Is it some new type of math the US airlines are using or have they become bloated Politically Correct business model disasters due to PC hiring practices and employee perks? The best analyses of the airline industry that I've read have concluded that it is questionable whether the industry as a whole has ever generated a profit for a sustained period of time. This includes the "good old days" pre-deregulation. The capital costs are enormous, the operating expenses are shocking (10s of millions a *day* for a big airline), and margins utterly unpredictable. The problem today is that there are now enough low-cost competitors to deny the majors real pricing power on enarly any flight other than international routes. Wherever, whenever you want to go, there is a cheap ticket available. Since the airlines eat the cost of flying the plane no matter how few seats they sell, they are better off selling seats at a loss and getting something. Their inventory is as perishable as sushi. Or are they looking for a tax payer bailout for their inefficient business operations? Always. Of course, an affordable air travel system is as much of an economic necessity as the highways, so the only question becomes whether the airlines are using the money they're given in the most efficient way possible. Top airline executives being paid millions while their companies hemmorhage money and they gripe about 56-year-old pilots making $270k do not set a good example. One also needs to consider that aircraft loans and leases occupy an important part of the financial landscape. Right now, if an airline like United were to go Chapter 7, there would be a major write-down on the value of an awful lot of its fleet. Back in 2002 when most of the gov't loans were made it was worse still. The collapse of one could trigger a cascade of write-downs, with companies like GE Capital in danger of being completely wiped out. Because of the way markets are leveraged these days, such a collapse could threaten all kinds of commercial credit, and even home mortgages. The expression "too big to fail" comes to mind. There is a lot of moral hazard when you make clear that you won't allow something to go completely bust- look at Amtrak for an example- but hard crashes in the wrong places at the wrong times can also cause very serious trouble. IMHO, 2005 is a long way from 2002, and we can afford a little bloodshed. Just curious Also, keep in mind that many if not most major international airlines are in fact flag carriers that are heavily subsidized and/or given favorable economic treatment in their home countries. Also, international travel has been less affected by the low-cost carriers, and if you look at their balance sheets, European (and Asian) airlines make most of their money on non-domestic travel, often long-haul. EasyJet and Ryanair are relatively newer presences in the EU travel market than Southwest & co. are over here. Also, there have been some extinctions in the EU recently, c.f. Swissair and Sabena. -cwk. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Europe and the U.S. operate in different competitive environments. It's
hard to compare the two. It's very hard to raise prices in the U.S. because of the deep discount carriers. Its like Wal-Mart and the old hardware store. Jet Blue and Southwest Airlines have reinvented the market, and the old timers are having to come up to speed or die. It's a classic example of how good free market works. The old, less efficient companies have to change or go out of business. Meanwhile, Southwest Airlines continue to make money, while others complain its not possible. A big win for innovation. I can fly from Sacramento, clear across the country to New York for $99. I can't fly from Italy to Germany for anything near that. If the socialist gov'ts of the EU allow it, discount carriers will soon take over the EU too and people will find its cheaper to fly than take the train. We're already starting to see that happen in Asia. -Robert, MBA |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peterpan" wrote in message .. . Delta announced today it will lose another 1 Billion dollars in 2005 Most of the US Airlines are losing money due to higher fuel cost's In Europe, airlines are making money and the fuel is 3 times more expensive. I don't get it. Is it some new type of math the US airlines are using or have they become bloated Politically Correct business model disasters due to PC hiring practices and employee perks? Or are they looking for a tax payer bailout for their inefficient business operations? Just curious Autogas is more expensive because the European governments add a tax to it; I'm sure JP is pretty much the same 'price' worldwide... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message oups.com... I can fly from Sacramento, clear across the country to New York for $99. I can't fly from Italy to Germany for anything near that. If the socialist gov'ts of the EU allow it, discount carriers will soon take over the EU too and people will find its cheaper to fly than take the train. We're already starting to see that happen in Asia. This was very true five years ago but not really any longer. EasyJet and Ryanair have opened this door wide enough that it won't be getting slammed shut again soon. -cwk. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
spaceship one | Pianome | Home Built | 169 | June 30th 04 05:47 AM |
Declared "minimum fuel" | O. Sami Saydjari | Instrument Flight Rules | 14 | April 4th 04 02:43 AM |
faith in the fuel delivery infrastructure | Chris Hoffmann | Piloting | 12 | April 3rd 04 01:55 AM |
Airplane Parts on Ebay Vac Reg Valves, Fuel Floats, O-200 Spider, Fuel Injection Valve | Bill Berle | Home Built | 0 | January 26th 04 07:48 AM |
C210 fuel tank vents | Eric Brown | Owning | 2 | September 27th 03 02:59 AM |