![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Question for the controllers he
The KMIC VOR-A is a pretty vanilla approach. The FAF is the Gopher VOR (GEP) about 5 miles north of the field. The missed procedure is to go back to GEP and hold north, left turns -- depicted as a dotted race track on the plate. (The FAA link seems to be broken for me, at least: http://naco.faa.gov/d-tpp/0405/05158VGA.PDF) I have been vectored into that hold (not entered from a miss) and then cleared for the approach. At that point, I flew the inbound leg towards the VOR/FAF and continued down the approach path to KMIC. Seemed logical to me and it certainly seemed to be what Minneapolis Approach was expecting. I have a CFII friend who thinks this was improper -- that since the hold was not depicted on the approach plate (as part of the approach) that I should have flown the full approach including the procedure turn. I guess his thought is that I wasn't really receiving vectors since I was in the hold. Who is right here? Me and Approach, or my friend? TIA, Mitty |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Instrument Checkride passed (Long) | Paul Folbrecht | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | February 11th 05 02:41 AM |
Instrument Rating Checkride PASSED (Very Long) | Alan Pendley | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | December 16th 04 02:16 PM |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
Hold "as published"? | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 83 | November 13th 03 03:19 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |