![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Getting mixed up about runways and airports can happen easily, as Roy's post
shows, and it happened to me Friday. I was picking up an Angel Flight patient at Jacksonville Craig (CRG). The weather was VMC, I already new from a NOTAM that 14/32 was closed, and the ATIS was advertising visuals to 23, so I don't have much excuse for what happened. Here's how it went: It was about 12:30 local and the airspace around Jacksonville was buzzing with traffic of all kinds. I arrived on a heading of about 100 and The TRACON had me at 4,000' coming into town. The airport was hard to see, but I finally spotted the black strip about 10 mi. out. The freq. was so busy I had a hard time telling the approach controller I had the airport in sight. Now I was getting antsy because I was 5 mi. out and still at 4,000. I was close enough to read the numbers when the controller finally answered, cleared me for the visual and handed me to Craig Tower. Unfortunately, I was looking at the brilliant, freshly painted numbers on closed 32, and I was reading them upside down. Poor old beat up, worn out, active 23 was barely identifiable as a runway. I was seriously fuddled, and didn't even realize it yet. Craig Tower told me to extend my downwind for traffic, which was fine with me since I had altitude to lose, and I made a sharp right for the downwind to what I thought was 23. In about 5 seconds a new, very authoritative-sounding voice came on the freq: "Cutlass '87D you were instructed to enter the downwind for 23. You appear to be making a 360. You were not authorized to make a 360. Turn to heading 050 immediately!" [Oh, dear. Oops. Oh, uh, yeah, 050 *would* be the downwind for 23, wouldn't it? Ever use that heading indicator you've got, sport?] "'87D, wilco." There followed a couple of more careful instructions from the tower to get the clueless dumbass on the ground without his hitting anybody, and that was that. Talk about embarrassing; ugh! Anyhow, that's what I get for taking routine things for granted, like properly identifying your runway and making sure all your position indications make sense. *sigh* Live and learn, I hope. -- Dan C-172RG at BFM |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GPS approach question | Matt Whiting | Instrument Flight Rules | 30 | August 29th 08 03:54 AM |
Interesting approach snafu. | Roy Smith | Instrument Flight Rules | 16 | April 16th 05 05:39 AM |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
Canadian holding procedures | Derrick Early | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | July 22nd 04 04:03 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |