![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I had an interesting experience earlier today. I thought after all this
time I had the CNX-80 figured out, but I found a new way to screw things up. I was on the POU GPS-24 (http://204.108.4.16/d-tpp/0508/00286VDG24.PDF), full procedure, Kingston IAF. We were IFR, in and out of IMC. We had been cleared for the appoach, which was loaded and executed in the GPS. We were on a heading of roughly 180 to IGN, and about a mile from the VOR, when the controller said something like, "I need to you to stay at 4000 and keep tracking outbound for a while for traffic below you". I agreed to do so and turned to a 060 heading. At this point, things started going downhill. I suppose, technically the controller committed an error. He had already cleared me for the approach, but then gave me instructions contrary to the procedure. I was in a sort of half-way place between flying the full procedure pilot nav and being on vectors. Better to have just canceled my approach clearance and given me vectors to avoid the traffic then back around for a fresh start. I was equally at fault for accepting this. But, now that I had made my pact with the devil, I needed to convince the GPS to play along with our game. The box hadn't yet sequenced past IGN, when I started my turn outbound. This seemed to have confused the computer. We were heading outbound on the PT, but the GPS was still navigating to IGN. In an attempt to convince it otherwise, I pulled up the flight plan page and selected direct to CFGUY, which got me what looked like positive (and correct) course guidance on the outbound leg. Eventually the controller told me I could turn back inbound and descend to 2900. I did so and found myself tracking inbound, but with the CDI giving me indications opposite of what it should have been, apparently the box thinking I was still trying to track outbound. I could see (from the moving map) that I was south of the final approach course, but the CDI was giving me "fly left" indication. At some point, while we were puzzling over this, the CDI suddenly flipped to "fly right"; I think this might have been as we passed CFGUY inbound. Everything proceeded normally from that point. I think the moral of the story here is that the computer is not good at ad-libbing procedures. Accepting an early turn outbound and an extended PT would have been a no-brainer with a real VOR-DME setup. With the GPS, since that wasn't what it was programmed to expect, things got ugly. On the other hand, with the moving map, it's hard to go too far wrong. As long as I had a picture of where I was relative to IGN, I could pretty much fly the desired track by eye as I sorted things out. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A nice video | Janusz Kesik | Soaring | 0 | October 8th 04 10:04 PM |
How much play in Archer Trim Jackscrew? | Bob Chilcoat | Owning | 1 | April 20th 04 12:42 AM |
??How can I get really nice looking video to play on my website?? | GREG PENKWITZ | Simulators | 1 | April 18th 04 04:52 AM |
1944 Aerial War Comes to Life in Radio Play | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | March 25th 04 10:57 PM |
How I got to Oshkosh (long) | Doug | Owning | 2 | August 18th 03 12:05 AM |