![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Our flight to Lansing, MI Wednesday was a good example of how XM
satellite weather can really help the average GA pilot. The plan was to fly due East to Valparaiso, Indiana, just east of the bottom of Lake Michigan, and then hang a left toward Lansing. We've made this trip a dozen or more times, and the weather around the bottom of the lake can be "interesting" -- no matter what time of year. When we took off, we knew there was an area of iffy weather to the north, drifting to the east. Knowing that we had "live" weather on board made all the difference, since we could constantly update the situation as we went. After some experimentation with the 496, we have found that it's possible to view cloud tops at various discrete altitudes. Since we had a very high scattered to broken layer (up around 10K) and a low scattered to broken layer (down around 2K), this feature was remarkably useful. With Mary working the XM, we were able to discern where the "edge" of the low stuff was with remarkable precision. (And, in reference to our post of a few days ago, the low stuff WAS being depicted on the satellite mosaic... Maybe they heard my complaint? :-) I stayed on "the clear side" of the lower broken layer for 40 miles, but this was gradually pushing us south of our intended course. Without XM, I would have maintained this course along this "edge" indefinitely. WITH XM, however, Mary was able to show me that this was a "dead end" course that would take us directly into some storms ahead in Illinois. She was able to see that all we needed to do was hang a left, cut across the lower widely scattered layer, and within 15 miles we'd be in clearer air on the north side of the layer. This is not something I would ever have done, before XM, since there would be no good way to know how far the scattered layer continued, or if it were improving or worsening ahead. With XM, however, it proved to be child's play, and we were able to fly all the way to Valparaiso without incident. Once we made the hard left turn toward Lansing, the scattered layer disappeared, and all was right with the world. Of course, on the opposite end of the spectrum, our flight home from Lansing has proved to be something that XM couldn't really help. I'm typing this in the FBO at South Bend, Indiana, where we landed yesterday afternoon after running into an absolute wall of crap. Because there are so few reporting stations in NW Indiana (strangely, they are RADIO AWOS's, but they don't appear in computerized weather depictions, including XM), we were proceeding in the "blind" (relatively speaking) with XM. The few reporting stations in the area were reporting good VFR ahead -- but we were running into wildy variable conditions, running from good VFR to just above minimums -- often within just a few miles. Just south of South Bend conditions dropped to absolute zero, with visibility and ceilings well below anything we're comfortable flying in, so we did a 180 and landed for the night. Now, the weather is terrific here, but absolute crap in Iowa, predicted to lift within the hour. As always, we've had a great time while we were here (found a fantastic steak house called "222" downtown, near the quite nice Holiday Inn), but I have to admit that the IFR ticket would have been a deal changer on this particular flight. (No ice or storms around now, just bad visibility and ceilings to the west. Although, in truth, Iowa City has been below even IFR minimums much of the morning.) Bottom line: XM is great for picking your way around popcorn storms. It doesn't do much good when bad weather is widespread over a large area, with no fronts to keep things moving along. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Senate Bill S.786 could kill NWS internet weather products | FlyBoy | Home Built | 61 | May 16th 05 09:31 PM |
Senate Bill S.786 could kill NWS internet weather products | FlyBoy | Owning | 61 | May 16th 05 09:31 PM |
Interesting Weather Site | Michael 182 | Piloting | 5 | February 1st 05 04:28 PM |