![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To get back into practice I fired up MSFS 2002 and grabbed a random (out
of date) chart to fly. It was the Bangor BGR ILS 33 approach (amdt 10B 03079, regular NOAA chart). So I gave the chart a quick glance, set up the nav frequencies as listed in the chart, and went flying. It took a few tries to get to fly right (the joystick needed calibration, I had to re-remember where the settings all were...) but once on the approach, I found the ILS needle was not agreeing with the ADF (for the LOM). IT wasn't really agreeing with reality either, as confirmed by checking the map view - it seemed like I was getting reverse sensing, and no glide slope, and the chart is for a normal ILS. There definately was a localizer, because I saw that needle on takeoff and coming around for the hold in lieu (done with the ADF). Well, on the chart, there is a balloon indicating the localizer frequency of 109.5, and also (be careful!) the nearby VOR frequency of 114.8 (which I had in the standby). Nope, that wasn't the mistake, I had 109.5 in the dial, I was on the right approach... since it was a sim (and I was still adjusting the joystick and such) I continued down, following the needle into neverland, then as an experiment crossing the approach course (and landing, across the runway, while I was doing that). Yep, reverse sensing, but no clue why. So, I studied the chart and a few others. There is an ILS 15 which uses the same frequency. As I understand it, both can have the same freq, since only one is used at a time. Then I saw it. On the upper left of the chart, it says LOC I-BGR 110.3, but on the balloon, it says 109.5. So, which is it? MSFS 2002 has 110.3. A call to Bangor confirmed that the ILS 33 was once 110.3, but now it has switched (both approaches - 15 and 33) to 109.5. 1: Look at the =entire= chart when briefing it!! 2: Is the chart in error, or is there a reason to have both frequencies on the chart as depicted? (I can't think of any). Jose -- "Never trust anything that can think for itself, if you can't see where it keeps its brain." (chapter 10 of book 3 - Harry Potter). for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
peculiar approach chart | Dave Butler | Instrument Flight Rules | 11 | May 27th 06 11:42 PM |
Mystery lines on NY VFR terminal chart | Ron Garret | Piloting | 3 | May 22nd 05 05:07 AM |
WAC Chart Images on line? | Rich | Owning | 5 | March 22nd 04 11:17 PM |
King Videos: Jeppesen Chart Review (2 tapes on eBay) Approaches & Enroute, Departures, & Arrivals | Cecil E. Chapman | Products | 0 | November 11th 03 05:14 PM |