A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

GPS Error: Vertical vs. Horizontal



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 13th 06, 07:40 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Marco Leon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 319
Default GPS Error: Vertical vs. Horizontal

When we look at a GPS error value in a so-equipped GPS, does that value
reflect *both* the vertical (i.e. altitude) and the horizontal
component? Can a separate value for each be determined?

The reason I ask is that in firing up my Garmin 496 (an early Christmas
present, comments to follow in another post ), I noticed the altitude
initially register at 100 ft below actual then right itself after a few
minutes. All of this happened while the horizontal location did not
noticeably move (had it fully-zoom by the way) which led me to believe
that the error can be different from each other at least initially.

Marco

  #2  
Old December 13th 06, 08:10 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Gig 601XL Builder
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,317
Default GPS Error: Vertical vs. Horizontal


"Marco Leon" wrote in message
ups.com...
When we look at a GPS error value in a so-equipped GPS, does that value
reflect *both* the vertical (i.e. altitude) and the horizontal
component? Can a separate value for each be determined?

The reason I ask is that in firing up my Garmin 496 (an early Christmas
present, comments to follow in another post ), I noticed the altitude
initially register at 100 ft below actual then right itself after a few
minutes. All of this happened while the horizontal location did not
noticeably move (had it fully-zoom by the way) which led me to believe
that the error can be different from each other at least initially.

Marco


The two errors are separate. So if they spec 100 ft +/- it could be 100ft in
the horizontal plane and 100ft in the vertical plane.


  #3  
Old December 13th 06, 10:08 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default GPS Error: Vertical vs. Horizontal

Marco Leon writes:

When we look at a GPS error value in a so-equipped GPS, does that value
reflect *both* the vertical (i.e. altitude) and the horizontal
component?


No. The vertical error is usually much greater than the horizontal
error. The displayed error, if there is only one, will generally be
the horizontal error.

Can a separate value for each be determined?


Yes, but it's only practical for the computer to do it.

The reason I ask is that in firing up my Garmin 496 (an early Christmas
present, comments to follow in another post ), I noticed the altitude
initially register at 100 ft below actual then right itself after a few
minutes. All of this happened while the horizontal location did not
noticeably move (had it fully-zoom by the way) which led me to believe
that the error can be different from each other at least initially.


Initially and continually. GPS altitudes should be treated as general
indications, not as precise altitudes that can be substituted for
altimeter readings.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #4  
Old December 14th 06, 01:09 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Travis Marlatte
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 233
Default GPS Error: Vertical vs. Horizontal

"Marco Leon" wrote in message
ups.com...
When we look at a GPS error value in a so-equipped GPS, does that value
reflect *both* the vertical (i.e. altitude) and the horizontal
component? Can a separate value for each be determined?

The reason I ask is that in firing up my Garmin 496 (an early Christmas
present, comments to follow in another post ), I noticed the altitude
initially register at 100 ft below actual then right itself after a few
minutes. All of this happened while the horizontal location did not
noticeably move (had it fully-zoom by the way) which led me to believe
that the error can be different from each other at least initially.

Marco


They have separate error characteristics and separate error indicators -
although they are dependent. Typically, if a GPS unit displays any kind of
error value, it is for the horizontal component simply because that is what
most users will want to see. It is most likely an interpretation of the
statistical error in units of meters or feet. The statistical error is
called dilution of position and most GPS receivers determine an HDOP, a
VDOP, and a couple of others.


--
-------------------------------
Travis
Lake N3094P
PWK


  #5  
Old December 14th 06, 03:17 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Ron Lee
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 295
Default GPS Error: Vertical vs. Horizontal

"Travis Marlatte" wrote:

"Marco Leon" wrote in message
oups.com...
When we look at a GPS error value in a so-equipped GPS, does that value
reflect *both* the vertical (i.e. altitude) and the horizontal
component? Can a separate value for each be determined?

The reason I ask is that in firing up my Garmin 496 (an early Christmas
present, comments to follow in another post ), I noticed the altitude
initially register at 100 ft below actual then right itself after a few
minutes. All of this happened while the horizontal location did not
noticeably move (had it fully-zoom by the way) which led me to believe
that the error can be different from each other at least initially.

Marco


They have separate error characteristics and separate error indicators -
although they are dependent. Typically, if a GPS unit displays any kind of
error value, it is for the horizontal component simply because that is what
most users will want to see. It is most likely an interpretation of the
statistical error in units of meters or feet. The statistical error is
called dilution of position and most GPS receivers determine an HDOP, a
VDOP, and a couple of others.

---------------------
Travis
Lake N3094P
PWK


Actually the DOPs are related to satellite geometry and are unitless.
It is only when you multiply the DOP by the signal/user equipment
error that you get some sort of error in feet/meters.

Ron Lee
  #6  
Old December 14th 06, 04:42 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Travis Marlatte
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 233
Default GPS Error: Vertical vs. Horizontal

"Ron Lee" wrote in message
...
"Travis Marlatte" wrote:

"Marco Leon" wrote in message
roups.com...
When we look at a GPS error value in a so-equipped GPS, does that value
reflect *both* the vertical (i.e. altitude) and the horizontal
component? Can a separate value for each be determined?

The reason I ask is that in firing up my Garmin 496 (an early Christmas
present, comments to follow in another post ), I noticed the altitude
initially register at 100 ft below actual then right itself after a few
minutes. All of this happened while the horizontal location did not
noticeably move (had it fully-zoom by the way) which led me to believe
that the error can be different from each other at least initially.

Marco


They have separate error characteristics and separate error indicators -
although they are dependent. Typically, if a GPS unit displays any kind of
error value, it is for the horizontal component simply because that is
what
most users will want to see. It is most likely an interpretation of the
statistical error in units of meters or feet. The statistical error is
called dilution of position and most GPS receivers determine an HDOP, a
VDOP, and a couple of others.

---------------------
Travis
Lake N3094P
PWK


Actually the DOPs are related to satellite geometry and are unitless.
It is only when you multiply the DOP by the signal/user equipment
error that you get some sort of error in feet/meters.

Ron Lee


The DOPs represent a statistical confidence. They do have a unit but you're
right, it's not in units of distance and it is not standardized.

Does the 496 display a value for the GPS error? Or, was it a hypothetical
question. If a GPS receiver does indicate the accuracy with something like
"+/- 5 meters" then it is really expressing a confidence and is more
correctly stated as "+/- 5 meters, 95% of the time" Or whatever confidence
they think looks the best to their consumer.

--
-------------------------------
Travis
Lake N3094P
PWK


  #7  
Old December 14th 06, 08:24 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
peter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 28
Default GPS Error: Vertical vs. Horizontal

Travis Marlatte wrote:
"Ron Lee" wrote in message
...


Actually the DOPs are related to satellite geometry and are unitless.
It is only when you multiply the DOP by the signal/user equipment
error that you get some sort of error in feet/meters.


The DOPs represent a statistical confidence. They do have a unit but you're
right, it's not in units of distance and it is not standardized.


No, Ron is correct that the various DOPs (PDOP, VDOP, HDOP, TDOP, etc.)
are unit-less measures based on the satellite geometry. They are
well-defined and standardized as specified in Section 3.1.3 of the
Navstar User Equipment guide:
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/gps/gpsuser/gpsuser.pdf

It's when the DOP, typically the HDOP, is translated into a
corresponding EPE (Estimated Position Error) or accuracy value that it
is converted into a measure with units of distance and these measures
are not standardized across manufacturers or even sometimes between
models of a given manufacturer.

I agree with some previous comments that the VDOP is generally somewhat
larger than HDOP due to the inherent geometry of the situation. You
usually have satellites on all sides of your position, but you can only
get signals from satellites above you, none below, and that reduces the
accuracy of the altitude calculation. An additional consideration in
the OP's case is that when the unit first gets enough satellite signals
to report a position it may only have enough for a '2D' calculation.
With three satellite signals, the unit can only determine the exact
time and two space coordinates, so it assumes the altitude based on the
last value previously seen and only calculates the lat. and long.
coordinates. Then when it gets one or more additional satellite
signals it can switch to '3D' mode and calculate the actual altitude as
well.

  #8  
Old December 14th 06, 09:40 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,749
Default GPS Error: Vertical vs. Horizontal

Marco,

When we look at a GPS error value in a so-equipped GPS, does that value
reflect *both* the vertical (i.e. altitude) and the horizontal
component? Can a separate value for each be determined?


The error values commonly given a

VDOP: Vertical Dilution of Position
HDOP: Horizontal Dilution of Position
PDOP: 3-D dilution of position, i.e. the above two combined

Most GPS receivers show these values.

Google and Wikipedia are your friends...

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #9  
Old December 14th 06, 11:20 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
NOSPAM@easily.co.uk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 91
Default GPS Error: Vertical vs. Horizontal

On 13 Dec 2006 11:40:00 -0800, "Marco Leon" wrote:

When we look at a GPS error value in a so-equipped GPS, does that value
reflect *both* the vertical (i.e. altitude) and the horizontal
component? Can a separate value for each be determined?

The reason I ask is that in firing up my Garmin 496 (an early Christmas
present, comments to follow in another post ), I noticed the altitude
initially register at 100 ft below actual then right itself after a few
minutes. All of this happened while the horizontal location did not
noticeably move (had it fully-zoom by the way) which led me to believe
that the error can be different from each other at least initially.

Marco


You can try to improve vertical accuracy using calculations from one
of the following websites but you need to know if your GPS is already
correcting or not!

http://sps.unavco.org/geoid/

http://earth-info.nga.mil/GandG/wgs8...0/intptW.html?
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For Sale: 1-34 horizontal stab/elevator Mitch Deutsch Soaring 0 November 12th 06 03:46 PM
Why are (some) delta wings stable without a horizontal tail? xerj Piloting 13 April 11th 06 02:38 AM
Horizontal Stab. rusted on stubs Michael Horowitz Restoration 5 April 8th 06 03:50 PM
WTB: 1-34 Horizontal Stabilizer Jeremy Zawodny Soaring 1 October 15th 04 05:12 AM
FA: Vaccum DG Horizontal (Mooney) KC Aviation Marketplace 1 December 29th 03 05:29 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.