Ping Daryl: About Buckley AFB

Can I get some independant confirmation on this bit below ?

I don't trust DH as a source.

In article ,
says...

"Henrietta K Thomas" wrote in message
...
Dave Casey is right, Daryl. Buckley was converted into
an active-duty air force base in 2000. Here are some
excerpts from a news story at the time, found on the web
at http://www.pmel.org/Buckley.htm.

I already posted where that Release was a bit premature of back dated
considering the Active Duty 460th was not redesignated until April 2001 and
not activated until October 2001. The base is currently not all the way
activated and still as much a National Guard Base as an AFB. Go to
http://www.buckley.af.mil/his.htm and read it there. You already know that
they leave out the parts or edit out the parts that will blow thier stories
into the next county.

The name did change in October of 2000 when the 821st took over th command
but the 821st was inactivated. Call it a holding outfit from the Space
Command while the 460th was being activated. The Base was still largely a
Guard Base at this point and is slowly being transformed. Base Housing has
yet to be completed as well as most of the support buildings that an Active
Duty Base requires.

I request you take a good hard look at the stark differences between a Guard
Base and an Active Duty Base. Regardless of the timeline of organization
(which is still being organized even today), a Guard Base can be one
building with a Chain link fence around the back yard. An Active Duty Base
or Post is a totally self contained community and Buckley is far from that
as of yet.

You will note that it does state that the 460th Air Wing is largely
Administrative in nature. That will change with the available Air Assets
return I suspect. Until then, the 460th is there to support the Navy,
Marines, Coast Guard, Air Force, Reserves and Guard Units that are there.
You will also note that they are behind on their building schedule by at
least a year and the cost has risen past the 100+ Million price tag.

This was brought on by the closure of Lowry Training Center (AFB) and the
closure of Fitzimins AFB Regional Hospital during the time when the past
administration was overzealous about shutting down military facilities. It
left one hell of a void. Actually, no a lot will change at Buckley except
that its going to be a lot more crowded and the Guards need not have so
many support personnel like Security Police, Law Enforcement and a bunch of
other support people. That, alone, translates to a reduction if the Guard
roster.

Now for the coup de whatever (can't speak french). One moron of the
:"Group" stated it was the wrong Service. LOL. There is a very large
contingent of Air Army National Guard there as well.
http://www.buckley.af.mil/organ3.htm . Once again, they only report what
supports them and not the real truth. Buckley is one of the most diverse
places I have ever seen in the number of Branches and types of Units that is
represented. But it always has been. With it being the only Military
Runway in Colorado except for the runway in Grand Junction Colorado
authorized to land High Perfomance Military Aircraft on a regular basis,
it's been used all along by the Actives as well as the Guards.

What is changing is who commands what, not who does what. Buckley has over
3000 acres to grow on so it's a very good choice. It's been underused as a
primary Guard Base and the area is in need of an expansion that is far
beyond the economics of the Air or Army Guards pocket books. When you sleep
with the devil to get something, it may end up owning you. This is a primary
example.

HKT, it's still primarily a Guard Base for the Colorado Air and Army
National Guard but that lessens on a daily basis and will continue to do so.
Right now, the Guards far outnumber the Regulars but it is progged to change
in the near future. Something about 5 to 7 years starting in October of
2000 when the 821st took command of the base from the 140th Air National
Guard. With the expansions happening, there are going to be a lot more than
15 ANG F-16s there in the end.

BTW, one of the mentions on the site is the term, "Total Force". That is
used in the context of ALL the branches of Service including the Air Force,
Navy, Marine, Army and National Guard. When you utilize that term or any
dirivitive of it, you just included all the branches as one. The "Group" is
correct in that term but it has a much, much broader meaning than they are
using it as. It always has.

There is some good reading for you there. I found it quite interesting and
none of it is the PR from the PR of 2000.




--
--
Remember, Friendly fire, Isn't :