![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I recently took my commercial ASEL ride and must retake a few parts of the
practical portion, but the complex single I've been using is no longer available to me. A CFI friend suggested that I could start my multiengine training now, then take a combined ASEL/AMEL commercial ride, whereby the complex requirement would be satisfied by the twin, and I could do the areas I need to retake in a non-complex single. Is this permissible? -- Matt |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt Johnson wrote:
I recently took my commercial ASEL ride and must retake a few parts of the practical portion, but the complex single I've been using is no longer available to me. A CFI friend suggested that I could start my multiengine training now, then take a combined ASEL/AMEL commercial ride, whereby the complex requirement would be satisfied by the twin, and I could do the areas I need to retake in a non-complex single. Is this permissible? I don't see why not. It looks like it should cover your bases. To be absolutely sure, why don't you ask your examiner if it will suit him? He's the one you have to satisfy. I do know you will eventually need a multi rating if you want to go anywhere in flying for a living. Even though you won't get any multi jobs to begin with, just the fact that you have the rating is going to open doors to you that weren't before. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 27, 10:24 pm, "Matt Johnson" wrote:
I recently took my commercial ASEL ride and must retake a few parts of the practical portion, but the complex single I've been using is no longer available to me. A CFI friend suggested that I could start my multiengine training now, then take a combined ASEL/AMEL commercial ride, whereby the complex requirement would be satisfied by the twin, and I could do the areas I need to retake in a non-complex single. Is this permissible? -- Matt We used to do the ASEL/AMEL rides together using a Cessna 140 and 310. All the complex requirements were done in the 310. -Robert |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message oups.com... On Jul 27, 10:24 pm, "Matt Johnson" wrote: I recently took my commercial ASEL ride and must retake a few parts of the practical portion, but the complex single I've been using is no longer available to me. A CFI friend suggested that I could start my multiengine training now, then take a combined ASEL/AMEL commercial ride, whereby the complex requirement would be satisfied by the twin, and I could do the areas I need to retake in a non-complex single. Is this permissible? -- Matt We used to do the ASEL/AMEL rides together using a Cessna 140 and 310. All the complex requirements were done in the 310. -Robert I did mine in a C-172 & C-310 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 28, 12:24 am, "Matt Johnson" wrote:
I recently took my commercial ASEL ride and must retake a few parts of the practical portion, but the complex single I've been using is no longer available to me. A CFI friend suggested that I could start my multiengine training now, then take a combined ASEL/AMEL commercial ride, whereby the complex requirement would be satisfied by the twin, and I could do the areas I need to retake in a non-complex single. Is this permissible? -- Matt Sure...you just fail an engine and do the re |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 28, 12:24 am, "Matt Johnson" wrote:
I recently took my commercial ASEL ride and must retake a few parts of the practical portion, but the complex single I've been using is no longer available to me. A CFI friend suggested that I could start my multiengine training now, then take a combined ASEL/AMEL commercial ride, whereby the complex requirement would be satisfied by the twin, and I could do the areas I need to retake in a non-complex single. Is this permissible? -- Matt Sure...gg you simply fail and feather one engine, do the failed portions of your SEL test, and fire up the other engine and finish the test for MEL. I seriously doubt an examiner will be able to do it. You can't have two engines or more and still call it a SEL. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ol Shy & Bashful wrote:
and I could do the areas I need to retake in a non-complex single. Is this permissible? Sure...gg you simply fail and feather one engine, do the failed portions of your SEL test, and fire up the other engine and finish the test for MEL. I seriously doubt an examiner will be able to do it. You can't have two engines or more and still call it a SEL. Uh... did you miss something here? -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 28, 12:24 am, "Matt Johnson" wrote:
I recently took my commercial ASEL ride and must retake a few parts of the practical portion, but the complex single I've been using is no longer available to me. A CFI friend suggested that I could start my multiengine training now, then take a combined ASEL/AMEL commercial ride, whereby the complex requirement would be satisfied by the twin, and I could do the areas I need to retake in a non-complex single. Is this permissible? -- Matt Yes...be careful with the dates (ie how long from the test to the retest) but the ME would easily satisfy the complex aircraft part of it. Wheather or not this is a good idear would depend precisly on what type of manuevers have to be redone... Robert |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 28, 9:35 am, "Robert M. Gary" wrote:
On Jul 27, 10:24 pm, "Matt Johnson" wrote: I recently took my commercial ASEL ride and must retake a few parts of the practical portion, but the complex single I've been using is no longer available to me. A CFI friend suggested that I could start my multiengine training now, then take a combined ASEL/AMEL commercial ride, whereby the complex requirement would be satisfied by the twin, and I could do the areas I need to retake in a non-complex single. Is this permissible? -- Matt We used to do the ASEL/AMEL rides together using a Cessna 140 and 310. All the complex requirements were done in the 310. -Robert Cessna 170 and a 135 hp Apache here. The MEI was done in a 235 apache at the same time as the II. Robert |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 07/28/07 10:26, Luke Skywalker wrote:
On Jul 28, 12:24 am, "Matt Johnson" wrote: I recently took my commercial ASEL ride and must retake a few parts of the practical portion, but the complex single I've been using is no longer available to me. A CFI friend suggested that I could start my multiengine training now, then take a combined ASEL/AMEL commercial ride, whereby the complex requirement would be satisfied by the twin, and I could do the areas I need to retake in a non-complex single. Is this permissible? -- Matt Yes...be careful with the dates (ie how long from the test to the retest) but the ME would easily satisfy the complex aircraft part of it. Well ... so long as the multi-engine airplane is a "complex". Not all of them are. Wheather or not this is a good idear would depend precisly on what type of manuevers have to be redone... Robert -- Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane, USUA Ultralight Pilot Cal Aggie Flying Farmers Sacramento, CA |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Yet another PP-ASEL privileges question | Yossarian | Piloting | 1 | September 21st 05 07:28 PM |
Glider cross-country time toward commercial SEL requrements? | Matt Michael | Soaring | 17 | November 25th 04 04:45 PM |
Glider to ASEL Conversion | solo89 | Piloting | 7 | July 10th 04 02:23 AM |
Amel;ia Aerhart | Bruce Wodetzki | Piloting | 5 | April 23rd 04 03:05 AM |
Part 91 Commercial Glider Rides to be Outlawed? | Vaughn | Soaring | 9 | October 27th 03 09:26 PM |