![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm going to try to sum up what I've learned in the discussions (?) of
yEnc and in my reading. Against yEnc: After reading Jeremy Nixon's anti-yEnc arguments, I can see that the real problem is not that yEnc isn't an improvement, but rather that it was not enough of an improvement over UU and didn't even attempt to solve some of its problems. Nixon was worried that it had already become the new standard 5 years ago. I can see his point--sometimes people settle for what is at best a partial fix to a given problem, and then effort is diverted away from seeking a more thorough fix (this is actually a common problem in the big organizations where I've spent my career--people "settle").. yEnc's improvement is big or small, depending on what you're posting. For the relatively small jpegs posted here, a 30% reduction in size by using yEnc doesn't amount to much in absolute terms. For an MP3 such as I posted in multimedia aviation, 30% amounts to much more, and for a big AVI, 30% would be quite a lot. That's why yEnc is dominant in the multimedia and audio groups. But in a still photo group, the pro-yEnc folks can't claim that yEnc has much practical superiority. Of course, as some have noted, even a little means something to somebody with dial-up, or download restrictions, and I don't want to be the classicallyy arrogant American who ignores the fact that access isn't the same everywhere. (As an aside, that makes me wonder how we look to other countries such as Japan, that have MUCH faster broadband--in terms of broadband, we stand about the same as we do in rail passenger transportation--far, far from the leading nations.) For yEnc: Even though it is only a little improvement, yEnc is unquestionably an improvement in terms of encoded file size. It costs little or nothing to get yEnc decoding ability, it requires no technical expertise, and it does not require a hardware upgrade of any kind. Consequently, the price paid for a little improvement is a little price. (By the way, if Nixon's arguments were taken seriously, what would replace UU is something that would REALLY make the anti-yEnc crowd shriek, although it would also represent much more of an improvement over UU--her agrues for an upgraded version of MIME encoding.) Finally, arguments that reference "the standard" or "guidelines" in an unmoderated group lacking any charter will never gain any traction. I've been on both sides of those kinds of arguments, and I can tell you what happened in every last instance. ______________ So it comes down to this: one side says "why post in yEnc, the improvement is not so great' while the other says "you're free to add yEnc encoding, and the cost is little or nothing." Neither side has anything even approaching a slam-dunk argument. yEnc is NOT so clearly superior that everyone should get yEnc decoding ability. Adding yEnc decoding ability is NOT so costly or difficult that it unreasonably blocks people from viewing files. That's why there will be no resolution--the arguments are weak on both sides. That's why it can only remain a choice. Live and let live-- the lesson they have yet to learn in the Middle East. That's my position. Don acknowledged that I never told anyone to leave. In fact, I never told anyone to do anything (although a few were pleased to tell me what to do). I'll tell you what you COULD do if you CHOSE, but that's about it. In turn, if somebody chose a new method of encoding, and I knew their pictures were worthwhile, I'd expect to do a little work to get their pictures--it isn't up to them to change to suit me. They already did the work of taking, editing, and posting the pictures, so I'm not going to moan about having to do something new to get them. I've had to learn lots of things in the microcomputer age, but it is just the price of getting the goodies the age has to offer so I am not complaining one bit. As a very-near-geezer I'm still awestruck by such things as the fact that I've seen thousands of cool aircraft photos FOR FREE, IN MY OWN HOME! Wowee! Is that cool or what? How I wish all this stuff had been available when I was a kid! Then maybe I wouldn't have painted my Corsair model pink with yellow stripes! (Kidding!!!) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Images: FACES OF THE FALLEN - Low Resolution? High Resolution? | Jarg | Military Aviation | 1 | April 9th 04 04:57 PM |
Digital world map for aviation (1km resolution) | Michal Tina | Military Aviation | 0 | February 27th 04 01:50 AM |
Digital world map for aviation (1km resolution) | Michal Tina | General Aviation | 0 | February 27th 04 01:50 AM |
Digital world map for aviation (1km resolution) | Michal Tina | Piloting | 0 | February 27th 04 01:50 AM |
fs2004 and screen resolution | cam lowes | Simulators | 2 | September 23rd 03 02:39 AM |