![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Clearly metric is a superior system for most expressions
of measurement, but it seems surprisingly inefficient for flying (especially soaring) in it's current form, which brings me to my question(s). Why do metric variometers read in m/s, instead of kph when the metric airspeed is in kph? Would it not make more sense to use kph on the vario too so quick mental L/D calculations could be done (for those who do not use a flight computer etc to think for them)? After doing a little homework, I figured out a 5 m/s is 18kph (1m/s is 3.6 kph). If I used metric to fly (I'm just plane knots) I would much rather have a vario that went up/down to 20kph, and was hash marked on single kilometers with numbers every 5th hash mark for the main vario. For a weak lift unit it would be hash marked for 1/5 kilometers but numbered every whole kilometer up/down to 5kph. Strong lift versions would be up/down to 30 or 40kph, hashed every second kilometer and numbered every 5th hash mark...Just a thought, but makes me curious. Paul Hanson "Do the usual, unusually well"--Len Niemi |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Metric Instruments | Roy Bourgeois | Soaring | 29 | May 27th 13 01:53 PM |
VW engines by metric AP | [email protected] | Home Built | 15 | August 7th 07 03:48 PM |
Metric Instruments? | AFSax | Soaring | 14 | August 24th 05 02:52 PM |
Off topic - Metric Nuts | Paul Remde | Soaring | 8 | May 5th 04 11:15 PM |
Wanted - Metric Altimeters | RHWOODY | Soaring | 0 | September 13th 03 10:20 PM |