A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » Aviation Images » Aviation Photos
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Why an Egret & an XB-70 are simular (1/1)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 17th 07, 08:42 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Greg Farr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 36
Default Why an Egret & an XB-70 are simular (1/1)







Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Great Egret landing 2.jpg
Views:	122
Size:	49.4 KB
ID:	18216  Click image for larger version

Name:	XB-70.jpg
Views:	41
Size:	48.9 KB
ID:	18217  
Attached Images
File Type: jpg b58chase_hnf_102.jpg (35.7 KB, 44 views)
  #2  
Old October 17th 07, 10:36 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
HEMI-Powered[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 98
Default Why an Egret & an XB-70 are simular (1/1)

Greg Farr added these comments in the current discussion du jour
....

Attachment decoded: Great Egret landing 2.jpg
`
Attachment decoded: XB-70.jpg


I see your point, Greg, but the XB-70 is just a tad bigger! grin
I remember looking at the one then outside of the Wright-Patterson
AFB USAF Museum, circa 1986 or so. What a huge but beautiful bird!
Not being a military aircraft guru at all, I never learned why the
XB-70 was never developed or even tested beyond (I think) only 2
prototypes, but then, a lot of aircraft and other weapons never get
developed or have a very short life.

--
HP, aka Jerry

"Never complain, never explain" - Henry Ford II
  #3  
Old October 18th 07, 05:24 AM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Norm DePlume
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 106
Default Why an Egret & an XB-70 are simular (1/1)

On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 21:36:02 GMT, "HEMI-Powered" wrote:

Greg Farr added these comments in the current discussion du jour
...

Attachment decoded: Great Egret landing 2.jpg
`
Attachment decoded: XB-70.jpg


I see your point, Greg, but the XB-70 is just a tad bigger! grin
I remember looking at the one then outside of the Wright-Patterson
AFB USAF Museum, circa 1986 or so. What a huge but beautiful bird!
Not being a military aircraft guru at all, I never learned why the
XB-70 was never developed or even tested beyond (I think) only 2
prototypes, but then, a lot of aircraft and other weapons never get
developed or have a very short life.


Hello,
By the time she was ready to fly, her speed and altitude capabilities
were insufficient to protect her from the, by then, improved Soviet
surface-to-air missile capabilities. Additionally, the costs of
production and operation were deemed excessive. Yes, only two were
built, but the second crashed during testing, taking with her co-pilot
Carl Cross and chase pilot Joe Walker.
  #4  
Old October 18th 07, 08:13 AM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
redc1c4
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 262
Default Why an Egret & an XB-70 are simular (1/1)

Greg Farr wrote:

[Image]

[Image]

[Image]


well, we know which one is still in service.....

redc1c4,
(it carries a nasty payload too. %-)
--
"Enlisted men are stupid, but extremely cunning and sly, and bear
considerable watching."

Army Officer's Guide
  #5  
Old October 18th 07, 01:20 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
tony.anquetil
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6
Default Why an Egret & an XB-70 are simular (1/1)

XB70 never entered in production due to :
a.. the development of accurate intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM), or their maritime counterparts submarine launched ballistic missiles (SLBM),
b.. the development of efficient Soviet surface-to-air missiles (SAM) and the MiG25 FOXBAT interceptor, able to hit bombers flying at high altitude and high speed (see the number of U2 spyplanes shot down),
c.. high development costs, during the Vietnam war-era,
d.. a crash,
e.. lobbying,
f.. other reasons I don't remember.
Sorry for my syntax, grammar and poor vocabulary. I'm French but I try to improve my English/American.
I'm ready to discuss about aeronautical subjects with anybody : I'm a pilot officer stored in a awful headquarter office. Please, help me!


"HEMI-Powered" a écrit dans le message news: ...
Greg Farr added these comments in the current discussion du jour
...

Attachment decoded: Great Egret landing 2.jpg
`
Attachment decoded: XB-70.jpg


I see your point, Greg, but the XB-70 is just a tad bigger! grin
I remember looking at the one then outside of the Wright-Patterson
AFB USAF Museum, circa 1986 or so. What a huge but beautiful bird!
Not being a military aircraft guru at all, I never learned why the
XB-70 was never developed or even tested beyond (I think) only 2
prototypes, but then, a lot of aircraft and other weapons never get
developed or have a very short life.

--
HP, aka Jerry

"Never complain, never explain" - Henry Ford II


  #6  
Old October 18th 07, 03:01 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
HEMI-Powered[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 98
Default Why an Egret & an XB-70 are simular (1/1)

tony.anquetil added these comments in the current discussion du
jour ...

XB70 never entered in production due to :
a.. the development of accurate intercontinental ballistic
missiles (ICBM), or their maritime counterparts submarine
launched ballistic missiles (SLBM), b.. the development of
efficient Soviet surface-to-air missiles (SAM) and the MiG25
FOXBAT interceptor, able to hit bombers flying at high
altitude and high speed (see the number of U2 spyplanes shot
down), c.. high development costs, during the Vietnam
war-era, d.. a crash,
e.. lobbying,
f.. other reasons I don't remember.
Sorry for my syntax, grammar and poor vocabulary. I'm French
but I try to improve my English/American. I'm ready to discuss
about aeronautical subjects with anybody : I'm a pilot
officer stored in a awful headquarter office. Please, help me!

A second excellent info post! Thank you! And, I'm sorry, but I
forgot to thank the other person who gave me a somewhat shorter
version of the story. After reading these two replies, NOW I
remember that the other prototype crashed, but even though I was
old enough to be aware of all of this, I guess I was busy being a
teen ager and didn't pay attention.

And, now that I see it, my fading memory does recall the Francis
Gary Powers U-2 incident in May, 1960 or thereabouts where the
CIA and the USAF discovered to their sorrow that the Soviets were
far more advanced with SAMs than they'd thought. Which, of
course, prompted the development of the SR-71 Blackbird but that
was strictly a spy plane and never modified for military use.
Later on, I recall a number of planes entering service either
before or after the XB-70 such as the B-58 Hustler, the first
supersonic bomber. But, I guess the development first of ICBMs
and not long after Polaris submarines made bombers nearly
obsolete. Except for the venerable Buff, the B-52. I heard
recently that the Air Force expects to keep flying the 52 until
something like 2030!

Nowadays, ostensibly, the Cold War threat is over. It really
isn't, but technocracy such as the B-2 stealth bomber seem to be
the way to go. But, GAWD, that XB-70 is an awesomely beautiful
HUGE bird!

As for your language and syntax, you're better than most
Americans. And, my respect and congrats for your service to your
country.

--
HP, aka Jerry

"Never complain, never explain" - Henry Ford II
  #7  
Old October 18th 07, 05:51 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Ron Monroe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 133
Default Why an Egret & an XB-70 are simular (1/1)

The crash occured long after the B-70 was canceled.They started cutting back the program before the first one ever flew.This was during the Macnamara years, which also contributed. There was an attempt to build a third aircraft, and, I believe they had already cut metal, before that, too was canceled.

They were also trying to convert the mission from a supersonic bomber to a supersonic reconaissance/strike aircraft. It would go in after any strike was made, recon, and, if any target was left, take it out. The new designation was to be RS-70. This too was killed.
Ron
"tony.anquetil" wrote in message ...
XB70 never entered in production due to :
a.. the development of accurate intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM), or their maritime counterparts submarine launched ballistic missiles (SLBM),
b.. the development of efficient Soviet surface-to-air missiles (SAM) and the MiG25 FOXBAT interceptor, able to hit bombers flying at high altitude and high speed (see the number of U2 spyplanes shot down),
c.. high development costs, during the Vietnam war-era,
d.. a crash,
e.. lobbying,
f.. other reasons I don't remember.
Sorry for my syntax, grammar and poor vocabulary. I'm French but I try to improve my English/American.
I'm ready to discuss about aeronautical subjects with anybody : I'm a pilot officer stored in a awful headquarter office. Please, help me!


"HEMI-Powered" a écrit dans le message news: ...
Greg Farr added these comments in the current discussion du jour
...

Attachment decoded: Great Egret landing 2.jpg
`
Attachment decoded: XB-70.jpg


I see your point, Greg, but the XB-70 is just a tad bigger! grin
I remember looking at the one then outside of the Wright-Patterson
AFB USAF Museum, circa 1986 or so. What a huge but beautiful bird!
Not being a military aircraft guru at all, I never learned why the
XB-70 was never developed or even tested beyond (I think) only 2
prototypes, but then, a lot of aircraft and other weapons never get
developed or have a very short life.

--
HP, aka Jerry

"Never complain, never explain" - Henry Ford II

  #8  
Old October 18th 07, 06:50 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Norm DePlume
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 106
Default Why an Egret & an XB-70 are simular (1/1)

Hello,
Your English is better than that of countless Americans.
  #9  
Old October 18th 07, 06:58 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Patrick R7
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 119
Default Why an Egret & an XB-70 are simular (1/1)

Norm DePlume a écrit :
Hello,
Your English is better than that of countless Americans.


:-)

--
Patrick R7
Site : http://www.verslesetoiles.fr/index.html
Forum modéré : http://spatial.forumdediscussions.com/
  #10  
Old October 18th 07, 08:01 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Jim[_8_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 47
Default Why an Egret & an XB-70 are simular (1/1)

Oh, Gawd! Help the poor man. He has to fly the dreaded Large Steel Desk. What a dreadful bummer for a pilot. And his office is probably in some back hall in the bowels of the Headquarters building.


"tony.anquetil" wrote in message ...
XB70 never entered in production due to :

snip
a.. I'm a pilot officer stored in a awful headquarter office. Please, help me!

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why an Egret & an XB-70 are simular (0/1) Greg Farr Aviation Photos 3 October 22nd 07 10:55 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.