![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Greg Farr added these comments in the current discussion du jour
.... Attachment decoded: Great Egret landing 2.jpg ` Attachment decoded: XB-70.jpg I see your point, Greg, but the XB-70 is just a tad bigger! grin I remember looking at the one then outside of the Wright-Patterson AFB USAF Museum, circa 1986 or so. What a huge but beautiful bird! Not being a military aircraft guru at all, I never learned why the XB-70 was never developed or even tested beyond (I think) only 2 prototypes, but then, a lot of aircraft and other weapons never get developed or have a very short life. -- HP, aka Jerry "Never complain, never explain" - Henry Ford II |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 21:36:02 GMT, "HEMI-Powered" wrote:
Greg Farr added these comments in the current discussion du jour ... Attachment decoded: Great Egret landing 2.jpg ` Attachment decoded: XB-70.jpg I see your point, Greg, but the XB-70 is just a tad bigger! grin I remember looking at the one then outside of the Wright-Patterson AFB USAF Museum, circa 1986 or so. What a huge but beautiful bird! Not being a military aircraft guru at all, I never learned why the XB-70 was never developed or even tested beyond (I think) only 2 prototypes, but then, a lot of aircraft and other weapons never get developed or have a very short life. Hello, By the time she was ready to fly, her speed and altitude capabilities were insufficient to protect her from the, by then, improved Soviet surface-to-air missile capabilities. Additionally, the costs of production and operation were deemed excessive. Yes, only two were built, but the second crashed during testing, taking with her co-pilot Carl Cross and chase pilot Joe Walker. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Greg Farr wrote:
[Image] [Image] [Image] well, we know which one is still in service..... redc1c4, (it carries a nasty payload too. %-) -- "Enlisted men are stupid, but extremely cunning and sly, and bear considerable watching." Army Officer's Guide |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
XB70 never entered in production due to :
a.. the development of accurate intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM), or their maritime counterparts submarine launched ballistic missiles (SLBM), b.. the development of efficient Soviet surface-to-air missiles (SAM) and the MiG25 FOXBAT interceptor, able to hit bombers flying at high altitude and high speed (see the number of U2 spyplanes shot down), c.. high development costs, during the Vietnam war-era, d.. a crash, e.. lobbying, f.. other reasons I don't remember. Sorry for my syntax, grammar and poor vocabulary. I'm French but I try to improve my English/American. I'm ready to discuss about aeronautical subjects with anybody : I'm a pilot officer stored in a awful headquarter office. Please, help me! "HEMI-Powered" a écrit dans le message news: ... Greg Farr added these comments in the current discussion du jour ... Attachment decoded: Great Egret landing 2.jpg ` Attachment decoded: XB-70.jpg I see your point, Greg, but the XB-70 is just a tad bigger! grin I remember looking at the one then outside of the Wright-Patterson AFB USAF Museum, circa 1986 or so. What a huge but beautiful bird! Not being a military aircraft guru at all, I never learned why the XB-70 was never developed or even tested beyond (I think) only 2 prototypes, but then, a lot of aircraft and other weapons never get developed or have a very short life. -- HP, aka Jerry "Never complain, never explain" - Henry Ford II |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
tony.anquetil added these comments in the current discussion du
jour ... XB70 never entered in production due to : a.. the development of accurate intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM), or their maritime counterparts submarine launched ballistic missiles (SLBM), b.. the development of efficient Soviet surface-to-air missiles (SAM) and the MiG25 FOXBAT interceptor, able to hit bombers flying at high altitude and high speed (see the number of U2 spyplanes shot down), c.. high development costs, during the Vietnam war-era, d.. a crash, e.. lobbying, f.. other reasons I don't remember. Sorry for my syntax, grammar and poor vocabulary. I'm French but I try to improve my English/American. I'm ready to discuss about aeronautical subjects with anybody : I'm a pilot officer stored in a awful headquarter office. Please, help me! A second excellent info post! Thank you! And, I'm sorry, but I forgot to thank the other person who gave me a somewhat shorter version of the story. After reading these two replies, NOW I remember that the other prototype crashed, but even though I was old enough to be aware of all of this, I guess I was busy being a teen ager and didn't pay attention. And, now that I see it, my fading memory does recall the Francis Gary Powers U-2 incident in May, 1960 or thereabouts where the CIA and the USAF discovered to their sorrow that the Soviets were far more advanced with SAMs than they'd thought. Which, of course, prompted the development of the SR-71 Blackbird but that was strictly a spy plane and never modified for military use. Later on, I recall a number of planes entering service either before or after the XB-70 such as the B-58 Hustler, the first supersonic bomber. But, I guess the development first of ICBMs and not long after Polaris submarines made bombers nearly obsolete. Except for the venerable Buff, the B-52. I heard recently that the Air Force expects to keep flying the 52 until something like 2030! Nowadays, ostensibly, the Cold War threat is over. It really isn't, but technocracy such as the B-2 stealth bomber seem to be the way to go. But, GAWD, that XB-70 is an awesomely beautiful HUGE bird! As for your language and syntax, you're better than most Americans. And, my respect and congrats for your service to your country. -- HP, aka Jerry "Never complain, never explain" - Henry Ford II |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The crash occured long after the B-70 was canceled.They started cutting back the program before the first one ever flew.This was during the Macnamara years, which also contributed. There was an attempt to build a third aircraft, and, I believe they had already cut metal, before that, too was canceled.
They were also trying to convert the mission from a supersonic bomber to a supersonic reconaissance/strike aircraft. It would go in after any strike was made, recon, and, if any target was left, take it out. The new designation was to be RS-70. This too was killed. Ron "tony.anquetil" wrote in message ... XB70 never entered in production due to : a.. the development of accurate intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM), or their maritime counterparts submarine launched ballistic missiles (SLBM), b.. the development of efficient Soviet surface-to-air missiles (SAM) and the MiG25 FOXBAT interceptor, able to hit bombers flying at high altitude and high speed (see the number of U2 spyplanes shot down), c.. high development costs, during the Vietnam war-era, d.. a crash, e.. lobbying, f.. other reasons I don't remember. Sorry for my syntax, grammar and poor vocabulary. I'm French but I try to improve my English/American. I'm ready to discuss about aeronautical subjects with anybody : I'm a pilot officer stored in a awful headquarter office. Please, help me! "HEMI-Powered" a écrit dans le message news: ... Greg Farr added these comments in the current discussion du jour ... Attachment decoded: Great Egret landing 2.jpg ` Attachment decoded: XB-70.jpg I see your point, Greg, but the XB-70 is just a tad bigger! grin I remember looking at the one then outside of the Wright-Patterson AFB USAF Museum, circa 1986 or so. What a huge but beautiful bird! Not being a military aircraft guru at all, I never learned why the XB-70 was never developed or even tested beyond (I think) only 2 prototypes, but then, a lot of aircraft and other weapons never get developed or have a very short life. -- HP, aka Jerry "Never complain, never explain" - Henry Ford II |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello,
Your English is better than that of countless Americans. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Norm DePlume a écrit :
Hello, Your English is better than that of countless Americans. :-) -- Patrick R7 Site : http://www.verslesetoiles.fr/index.html Forum modéré : http://spatial.forumdediscussions.com/ |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oh, Gawd! Help the poor man. He has to fly the dreaded Large Steel Desk. What a dreadful bummer for a pilot. And his office is probably in some back hall in the bowels of the Headquarters building.
"tony.anquetil" wrote in message ... XB70 never entered in production due to : snip a.. I'm a pilot officer stored in a awful headquarter office. Please, help me! |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why an Egret & an XB-70 are simular (0/1) | Greg Farr | Aviation Photos | 3 | October 22nd 07 10:55 AM |