![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've got what may be a dumb question (since I suspect the answer is
obvious), but here it goes: If I am looking at buying an experimental homebuilt with a retractable conventional gear; BUT under 200hp and a fixed pitch prop, do I need a complex endorsement to legally fly, or is that just with regards to aircraft with standard airworthiness certificates (factory built)? I'm having an argument on FAR trivia, and was curious what people thought. Cheers! Ryan in Madison |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FADEC = complex | Bob Gardner | Piloting | 237 | November 29th 06 01:55 AM |
Is this a Complex Plane? | [email protected] | Piloting | 12 | December 7th 05 03:19 AM |
Engine with Complex History | Mike Granby | Owning | 4 | August 30th 04 02:48 AM |
The "Complex" TAS calculation | Arnold Pieper | Soaring | 2 | December 14th 03 12:22 PM |
Complex aircraft question | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 5 | October 17th 03 12:25 PM |