![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's another question for you engineers out there. Traditional
airplane design has the tail pressing down, so the tail is fighting the work that the main wing is doing. A tandem-wing airplane in which both front and rear wings are lifting upward is a more efficient design, which is one reason Bert Rutan chose the canard configuration for so many of his designs. But in the canard configuration, the front wing is smaller than the rear wing. This is what I don't understand. It seems to me that a design in which the front wing was larger and the rear wing was smaller would be more stable in pitch. The smaller rear wing would automatically damp pitch excursions like the fins of an arrow. So why is the canard the most successful tandem- wing design flying? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Yaw control in a tandem rotor helo? | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 0 | January 14th 07 12:02 AM |
Yaw control in a tandem rotor helo? | Chris W | Piloting | 3 | January 13th 07 12:04 AM |
Yaw control in a tandem rotor helo? | Morgans | Piloting | 1 | January 12th 07 10:26 PM |
Yaw control in a tandem rotor helo? | Stealth Pilot | Piloting | 0 | January 12th 07 02:38 PM |
Tandem Mi-26? | PDR | Military Aviation | 6 | June 6th 04 10:49 AM |