![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The F-15 Eagle was designed in the 1960s. The Advanced Tactical Fighter, YF-23 and YF-22, were developed in the 1980s. The F-22 Raptor is simply the production version of the YF-22. Worse, some of the specifications and capabilities that the ATF was supposed to have, as of the 1980s, was dropped from the YF-22 and final F-22. Worse still, the watered-down F-22 came into service 5-10 years later than originally planned. Worse yet, instead of 750+ or even 380+, the Air Force is currently slated to get less than 200 copies. The F-35 JSF is newer than F-22, but is really a low-end solution optimized for ground attack and only modest (even if decent) air-to- air capabilities. F-22 / F-35 is another high/low mix like the F-15/F-16. But unlike the F-15, of which there were a decent number (many hundreds), there will be precious few F-22s. Sure the F-22 can win against 5- to-1 odds or even 10-to-1 odds. But what about 20-to-1 odds, if the USAF is pitted against Russia+China within the next 10-15 years? Also I feel the F-15 was more advanced for the 1970s than the F-22 is this decade, relatively speaking. Obviously I am not saying the F-15 is more advanced than the F-22, I am saying the F-22 is not as state- of-the-art now as the F-15 was back then. The F-15 was a tremendous leap beyond the F-4. Is the F-22 really that much of a leap beyond the F-15? Maybe in sensors and low-observability "stealth". The F-22 carries almost the same weapon systems and weapons load as the F-15. Sure there have been some improvements to the AMRAAM and Sidewinder, but not a revolution. I know there will be those that disagree with me, and maybe some who agree. I do not believe that unmanned aircraft will take over the air- superiority / air-supremacy / air-dominance role as quickly as some think. Not by 2020-2030 anyway. Maybe I am wrong but I don't think so. The F-22 is finally in service now (as of a couple years ago). Back in 1981 and early 1980s, the USAF came up for the requirements for the ATF, what would, about 25 years later, be in service as the F-22. What, if anything, is the USAF thinking about in now 2008 for the future of the air to air mission, as it was in the early 1980s with the ATF? I'm thinking of not only the needs of the USAF, but services that depend on the USAF, such as the U.S Army and U.S. Marine Corps. The U.S. Navy seems to have given up on advanced high-end fighters. There is no true direct replacement for the F-14 Tomcat. The Naval ATF / F-22N was canceled over 15 years ago. I don't believe the Super Hornet nor the F-35 are going to be able to provide air dominance. Unless something changes, the entire U.S. armed forces will depend on, give or take, 183 F-22 Raptors. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GAO: Joint Strike Fighter: Management of the Technology Transfer Process. | Mike | Naval Aviation | 0 | March 16th 06 02:38 PM |
"Why Raptor? The Logic of Buying the World's Best Fighter" | Mike | Military Aviation | 0 | August 11th 04 03:20 PM |
Airpower: India threatens US air superiority | Krztalizer | Military Aviation | 71 | July 10th 04 08:06 AM |
Air Force Raptor fighter starts operational trials, By John J. Lumpkin | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | May 1st 04 10:18 PM |
USAF Fighter-Attack SPO members from the 1980s? | R Haskin | Military Aviation | 0 | September 20th 03 12:06 PM |