![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Waldo
I'm only about an 1/8 of the way looking through all those magazines & looking a every Hurricane pic I can find. Specifically what should I see if one is fitted with RADAR. Do they have the "pitch fork" type antenna or a radome of some sort?? Thanks Graham |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Graham...
The antenna structure is described as follows. The aerial system on BN288 (A standard MkIIC) comprised a Type 69 transmitting dipole taken from the Mosquito AI installation, which needed moving inboard of the landing light to clear the guns, Defiant Type 29 unipole arrays for the elevation elements and vertically polarised azimuth dipoles taken from the night-fighter version of the Fairey Fulmar. So armed with that description here is a picture that I generated a while ago and posted the other day, in case it helped jog a memory. I so appreciate the effort Graham! Waldo. On Fri, 30 May 2008 02:35:43 GMT, "TacAN" wrote: Hi Waldo I'm only about an 1/8 of the way looking through all those magazines & looking a every Hurricane pic I can find. Specifically what should I see if one is fitted with RADAR. Do they have the "pitch fork" type antenna or a radome of some sort?? Thanks Graham |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 30 May 2008 4:57:56 +0100, Waldo.Pepper wrote
(in message ): The antenna structure is described as follows. The aerial system on BN288 (A standard MkIIC) comprised a Type 69 transmitting dipole taken from the Mosquito AI installation, which needed moving inboard of the landing light to clear the guns, Defiant Type 29 unipole arrays for the elevation elements and vertically polarised azimuth dipoles taken from the night-fighter version of the Fairey Fulmar. So armed with that description here is a picture that I generated a while ago and posted the other day, in case it helped jog a memory. I'm intrigued by this thread and am interested to see what will turn up, if only because I find it difficult to imagine how they could squeeze in the equipment needed, not least the Indicator Unit in the cockpit. I'd never heard of radar-equipped Hurricanes before but have since found a couple of references to them. One source (Edward Shacklady's book on the Hurricane) says, almost in passing, that they had a Mk V radar in an underwing 'container' (autumn 1941, apparently). In other words, not the Mk VI you referred to and not the arrangement you drew. The other reference is an on-line account by a Beaufighter navigator of a 176 Squadron action in which 3 of their Hurricanes were shot down and a fourth damaged beyond repair. This mentions that "To enable the Hurricanes to carry radar they were stripped of their armour protection". http://www.bbc.co.uk/ww2peopleswar/s...a2740394.shtml No pictures, of course. -- |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Waldo.Pepper" wrote in message ... Graham... The antenna structure is described as follows. The aerial system on BN288 (A standard MkIIC) comprised a Type 69 transmitting dipole taken from the Mosquito AI installation, which needed moving inboard of the landing light to clear the guns, Defiant Type 29 unipole arrays for the elevation elements and vertically polarised azimuth dipoles taken from the night-fighter version of the Fairey Fulmar. So armed with that description here is a picture that I generated a while ago and posted the other day, in case it helped jog a memory. Grateful if you could email me the drawing please - I can't see it on my isp. Thanks Were these particular Hurricanes painted black, by any chance?? I so appreciate the effort Graham! Waldo - my pleasure. Just hope I can find that elusive picture Waldo. On Fri, 30 May 2008 02:35:43 GMT, "TacAN" wrote: Hi Waldo I'm only about an 1/8 of the way looking through all those magazines & looking a every Hurricane pic I can find. Specifically what should I see if one is fitted with RADAR. Do they have the "pitch fork" type antenna or a radome of some sort?? Thanks Graham |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 30 May 2008 7:22:19 +0100, Netko
wrote: if only because I find it difficult to imagine how they could squeeze in the equipment needed, not least the Indicator Unit in the cockpit. I'd never heard of radar-equipped Hurricanes before but have since found a couple of references to them. One source (Edward Shacklady's book on the Hurricane) says, almost in passing, that they had a Mk V radar in an underwing 'container' (autumn 1941, apparently). In other words, not the Mk VI you referred to and not the arrangement you drew. In response to the above - - Despite being a fine book, sadly the Shacklady book is (I am afraid to say) definitively wrong on a couple of points that I shall attempt to explain. Other books have made the same error in thinking that some Hurricane's had Mark V installed in modified drop tanks (like has already been mentioned). It is easy to mix up Mark V and VI (easy in terms of a typing transcription error I mean) But in reality the two sets differ in some significant ways. One Hurricane WAS test fitted with Mark VI (though NOT Mark V) with the bulk of the gear housed in modified drop tanks. (Also one Typhoon was also tested with Mark VI in modified drop tanks). These tests proved this installation scheme a failure. No drop tanks nor tropical filters were fitted on the Hurricanes fitted with AI Mark VI. (Again presumably for performance reasons.) Mark VI added (an estimated) 200lbs to the Hurricane. Presumably 176 Squadron on their own decided to remove the armour to partially compensate for this additional weight. Considering that they were up against lightweight Japanese planes who can blame them!? Mark VI was specifically designed from the outset to be for fitting in single seaters. (Unlike Mark V, which was fitted to some Beaufighters, and some Mosquitos.) Mark VI was installed, and saw service in these Hurricanes, as well as the Defiant. (Again those books that make mention of Mark IV in Defiant are wrong as well. Though the Defiant had mock ups of the Mark IV sets produced for testing it was the Mark VI that was ultimately installed. Again with the Pilot the crew member who viewed the indicator tube, and operated the set.) A pilot of 176 Squadron, who normally flew Beaufighters equipped with Radar was lost flying one of these Mark VI equipped Hurricanes (it seems) against Japanese Zeros. See this link for more on Pilot Officer Pring. http://www.maltap.com/anglo/site/ind...pe=view&id=104 The Mark VI was virtually automatic in operation, and had a single indicator tube. In the Hurricane cockpit this was placed in the position of the undercarriage indicator. With the undercarriage indictor itself repositioned to where the clock would normally reside. (The clock being eliminated altogether.) Hope I got it all right. It is so easy to get such specific details wrong. Waldo. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Done with my gratitude. Waldo. On Fri, 30 May 2008 08:09:25 GMT, "TacAN" wrote: Grateful if you could email me the drawing please - I can't see it on my isp. Thanks |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 30 May 2008 9:55:17 +0100, Waldo.Pepper wrote
(in message ): A pilot of 176 Squadron, who normally flew Beaufighters equipped with Radar was lost flying one of these Mark VI equipped Hurricanes (it seems) against Japanese Zeros. See this link for more on Pilot Officer Pring. http://www.maltap.com/anglo/site/ind...pe=view&id=104 The action described in the link I gave is the one in which Flying Officer (rather than Pilot Officer) Pring was killed (as was another pilot). Hope I got it all right. It is so easy to get such specific details wrong. It's all interesting stuff and I hope something turns up. -- ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com ** |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Also no pictures, but "Fighter Squadrons of the RAF and their Aircraft" by John Rawlings (rev. edition, 1976) mentions the fit as AI Mk.VI. It gives example serials for Hurricane IIc : HV709 L HW341 O HW435 N KX359 Q KX754 N "So far as is known No. 176 Squadron used no squadron identity markings on its aircraft." Hope this was of some help, Bob ^,,^ |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I new the serial numbers and that Pring was lost in 709
The lack of Squadron identity part was new. Hopefully a picture will turn up to further my/our knowledge. Another book I shall have to seek out! Thanks Bob. On Sat, 31 May 2008 00:10:30 GMT, Bob Harrington wrote: Also no pictures, but "Fighter Squadrons of the RAF and their Aircraft" by John Rawlings (rev. edition, 1976) mentions the fit as AI Mk.VI. It gives example serials for Hurricane IIc : HV709 L HW341 O HW435 N KX359 Q KX754 N "So far as is known No. 176 Squadron used no squadron identity markings on its aircraft." Hope this was of some help, Bob ^,,^ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Re ping Waldo Hoos et al | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 0 | March 16th 08 09:34 AM |
Ping Waldo Hoos et al | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 0 | March 16th 08 09:30 AM |
Ping KM (or KU or KMU) | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 1 | March 16th 07 02:50 AM |
PING Jay H ... | Jay Beckman | Piloting | 11 | February 1st 06 03:18 AM |
The Great Waldo Springer ... | Larry Smith | Home Built | 0 | August 14th 03 04:03 AM |