If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Eurofighter grounded!
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
According to the Times article, France is still buying the jet (but there's
no mention of Spain!). Can this be true? Shoddy work, surely?! -- Steve Davies "F-15 Eagle & Strike Eagle. Combat Legends" ISBN 1840 373 776 "F-15E Strike Eagle; The Inside Story" ISBN 1840 373 784 www.f-15e.net "Erik Pfeister" wrote in message ... http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article...853318,00.html |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 07:28:30 +0100, "Steve Davies"
wrote: According to the Times article, France is still buying the jet (but there's no mention of Spain!). Can this be true? Shoddy work, surely?! Uh. . .*France* buying Eurofighter? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
That again a journalistic bug. They just made a confusion between France and
Italy.... "Scott Ferrin" a écrit dans le message de news: ... On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 07:28:30 +0100, "Steve Davies" wrote: According to the Times article, France is still buying the jet (but there's no mention of Spain!). Can this be true? Shoddy work, surely?! Uh. . .*France* buying Eurofighter? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Steve Davies" wrote in message ...
According to the Times article, France is still buying the jet (but there's no mention of Spain!). Can this be true? Shoddy work, surely?! Shoddy work? You mean shoddy as to the article, or the airplane...? It is rather surprising that the paper decided to have France participate in the program and procure the aircraft so many years after it bailed when it became apparent that the Rafale-route was not going to be chosen path of the consortium, especially as France has experienced significant difficulty in funding the still rather paltry procurement of Rafale to date! Brooks -- Steve Davies snip |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
On 14 Oct 2003 05:38:48 -0700, Kevin Brooks wrote:
"Steve Davies" wrote in message ... According to the Times article, France is still buying the jet (but there's no mention of Spain!). Can this be true? Shoddy work, surely?! Shoddy work? You mean shoddy as to the article, or the airplane...? The article. The journalist is totally misinformed if he thinks France is buying it. -- "It's easier to find people online who openly support the KKK than people who openly support the RIAA" -- comment on Wikipedia (My real email address would be if you added 275 to it and reversed the last two letters). |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Mike" wrote in message ...
Certainly for this last point,but because of money,and never because of technics. This program (Rafale),has never had any of the numerous problems of the typhoon,still going on... So maybe we can think we were right not to gor for it.... If it is so much better than Typhoon, why, despite repeated attempts, has it not yet received an export order, even losing out to Typhoon in a couple of competitive selections IIRC? One major reason that France has difficulty affording rafale is the distinct lack of export success (exports would drop the unit cost of the aircraft the French want to buy for themselves). It appears that the Singapore competition is the rafale's last major opportunity to redress this problem (especially as the Brazilian F-X program is now more or less moribund); I'd imagine the various competitors are keeping a close eye on that situation in light of the rather dubious marketing ploys Dassault attempted during the ROKAF competition that was eventually lost to the F-15K. Brooks "Kevin Brooks" a écrit dans le message de news: ... "Steve Davies" wrote in message ... According to the Times article, France is still buying the jet (but there's no mention of Spain!). Can this be true? Shoddy work, surely?! Shoddy work? You mean shoddy as to the article, or the airplane...? It is rather surprising that the paper decided to have France participate in the program and procure the aircraft so many years after it bailed when it became apparent that the Rafale-route was not going to be chosen path of the consortium, especially as France has experienced significant difficulty in funding the still rather paltry procurement of Rafale to date! Brooks -- Steve Davies snip |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
I still recon Australia should have the Typhoon not going after F 35
"Kevin Brooks" wrote in message om... "Mike" wrote in message ... Certainly for this last point,but because of money,and never because of technics. This program (Rafale),has never had any of the numerous problems of the typhoon,still going on... So maybe we can think we were right not to gor for it.... If it is so much better than Typhoon, why, despite repeated attempts, has it not yet received an export order, even losing out to Typhoon in a couple of competitive selections IIRC? One major reason that France has difficulty affording rafale is the distinct lack of export success (exports would drop the unit cost of the aircraft the French want to buy for themselves). It appears that the Singapore competition is the rafale's last major opportunity to redress this problem (especially as the Brazilian F-X program is now more or less moribund); I'd imagine the various competitors are keeping a close eye on that situation in light of the rather dubious marketing ploys Dassault attempted during the ROKAF competition that was eventually lost to the F-15K. Brooks "Kevin Brooks" a écrit dans le message de news: ... "Steve Davies" wrote in message ... According to the Times article, France is still buying the jet (but there's no mention of Spain!). Can this be true? Shoddy work, surely?! Shoddy work? You mean shoddy as to the article, or the airplane...? It is rather surprising that the paper decided to have France participate in the program and procure the aircraft so many years after it bailed when it became apparent that the Rafale-route was not going to be chosen path of the consortium, especially as France has experienced significant difficulty in funding the still rather paltry procurement of Rafale to date! Brooks -- Steve Davies snip |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Mike" wrote in message ... Another point are the missions;Rafale is very versatile, Typhoon is an interceptor. I don't know what you or the partners of Typhoon think about it, but at the moment,and for now 15 years,it may be more useful to have a good multi-purpose aircraft,than an interceptor. This is nonsense. Typhoon has been designed from the beginning as a multi-role aircraft. For air-to-surface missions, the Eurofighter can carry Brimstone and DWS 37 anti-armor weapons-three under each wing and one under the center fuselage, as well as laser-guided and GPS guided weapons. Keith |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:39:54 +0200, Mike wrote:
Both are late,Typhoon because of technics,Rafale because of money. I think Typhoon has had money problems too -- Germany threatens to pull out every few years. I don't know what you or the partners of Typhoon think about it, but at the moment,and for now 15 years,it may be more useful to have a good multi-purpose aircraft,than an interceptor. Maybe. I disagree -- the bombing role can best be done by unpiloted aircraft. -- "It's easier to find people online who openly support the KKK than people who openly support the RIAA" -- comment on Wikipedia (My real email address would be if you added 275 to it and reversed the last two letters). |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Eurofighter is turning into German nightmare | Chad Irby | Military Aviation | 45 | October 4th 03 03:18 AM |
Eurofighter Galleries | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 0 | September 17th 03 08:28 AM |
Eurofighter - useless in cold weather and fog? | Peter Kemp | Military Aviation | 9 | September 13th 03 04:37 AM |
Eurofighter SCF and drag | John Cook | Military Aviation | 0 | July 27th 03 01:38 AM |
Eurofighter Costs | John Cook | Military Aviation | 0 | July 9th 03 11:58 AM |