If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Where to post questions?
'Cause I have one- Filed to cruise at 8500. Two GPS's (old simple one in the plane and my new portable) say I'm at 8500, but pressure altimeter says I'm at 8000. I of course set my altimeter to departing airport elevation, which should calibrate it to current pressure and nonstandard temperature, right? Do I...
* fly what seems to be accurate and correct readouts on both of my GPS's? Then risk my altimeter being off and my Mode C reporting incorrectly... * fly GPS's and adjust altimeter to read the GPS altitude, even though the altimeter setting is not what is reported? * fly the altimeter set at reported conditions, have my Mode C report accurately, but run the risk of being off VFR altitude? Thanks |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Where to post questions?
WhenTurtlesFly wrote:
'Cause I have one- Filed to cruise at 8500. Two GPS's (old simple one in the plane and my new portable) say I'm at 8500, but pressure altimeter says I'm at 8000. I of course set my altimeter to departing airport elevation, which should calibrate it to current pressure and nonstandard temperature, right? Do I... * fly what seems to be accurate and correct readouts on both of my GPS's? Then risk my altimeter being off and my Mode C reporting incorrectly... U.S. FAR 91.121(a) implies flying by reference to an altimeter whose output can be adjusted from station readings or actual airport elevation. I doubt either of your GPS's allow such adjustment settings, so you probably can't fly VFR cruising altitudes by reference to them. * fly GPS's and adjust altimeter to read the GPS altitude, even though the altimeter setting is not what is reported? Regulations do not appear to allow setting an altimeter to anything other than a barometric altimeter setting from a station within 100 NM, other appropriate station, or to actual elevation of a departure airport. * fly the altimeter set at reported conditions, have my Mode C report accurately, but run the risk of being off VFR altitude? Unless your altimeter is way out of calibration (in which case you probably shouldn't be flying that airplane until the problem is corrected,) then everyone else near your aircraft should in theory be flying with similar offsetting temperature and pressure differences, so long as they are all "off" in the same way. (Unfortunately it isn't hard to think up cases where the above fails to work out.) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Where to post questions?
WhenTurtlesFly writes:
'Cause I have one- Filed to cruise at 8500. Two GPS's (old simple one in the plane and my new portable) say I'm at 8500, but pressure altimeter says I'm at 8000. I of course set my altimeter to departing airport elevation, which should calibrate it to current pressure and nonstandard temperature, right? Do I... * fly what seems to be accurate and correct readouts on both of my GPS's? Then risk my altimeter being off and my Mode C reporting incorrectly... No. The altimeter is more accurate than the GPS units. The fact that the two GPS units agree simply means that they are both subject to the same error when operating in the same place at the same time. * fly GPS's and adjust altimeter to read the GPS altitude, even though the altimeter setting is not what is reported? No. The altimeter is more accurate than the GPS units. * fly the altimeter set at reported conditions, have my Mode C report accurately, but run the risk of being off VFR altitude? Yes. Fly the altimeter. The risk of being 500 feet off is virtually nil if you've set the altimeter correctly to begin with. GPS provides very poor vertical accuracy compared to a barometric altimeter. GPS is designed for lateral accuracy rather than vertical accuracy. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Where to post questions?
Mxsmanic wrote:
WhenTurtlesFly writes: 'Cause I have one- Filed to cruise at 8500. Two GPS's (old simple one in the plane and my new portable) say I'm at 8500, but pressure altimeter says I'm at 8000. I of course set my altimeter to departing airport elevation, which should calibrate it to current pressure and nonstandard temperature, right? Do I... * fly what seems to be accurate and correct readouts on both of my GPS's? Then risk my altimeter being off and my Mode C reporting incorrectly... No. The altimeter is more accurate than the GPS units. The fact that the two GPS units agree simply means that they are both subject to the same error when operating in the same place at the same time. His new portable would almost certainly use WAAS when available and would not be off by 500 ft. * fly GPS's and adjust altimeter to read the GPS altitude, even though the altimeter setting is not what is reported? No. The altimeter is more accurate than the GPS units. WAAS is accurate to 25 ft vertically 95% of the time. Standard aneroid altimeter have no adjustment for changes from non-standard temperature. A temp difference of ~4 degrees Celsius from standard atmosphere would show a 500 ft difference. * fly the altimeter set at reported conditions, have my Mode C report accurately, but run the risk of being off VFR altitude? Yes. Fly the altimeter. The risk of being 500 feet off is virtually nil if you've set the altimeter correctly to begin with. GPS provides very poor vertical accuracy compared to a barometric altimeter. GPS is designed for lateral accuracy rather than vertical accuracy. Which is why WAAS was developed. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Where to post questions?
Mxsmanic wrote:
GPS provides very poor vertical accuracy compared to a barometric altimeter. GPS is designed for lateral accuracy rather than vertical accuracy. Babbling nonsense when talking about aviation GPS. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Where to post questions?
On Jul 12, 1:34*pm, WhenTurtlesFly wrote:
'Cause I have one- *Filed to cruise at 8500. *Two GPS's (old simple one in the plane and my new portable) say I'm at 8500, but pressure altimeter says I'm at 8000. *I of course set my altimeter to departing airport elevation, which should calibrate it to current pressure and nonstandard temperature, right? *Do I... * fly what seems to be accurate and correct readouts on both of my GPS's? *Then risk my altimeter being off and my Mode C reporting incorrectly... * fly GPS's and adjust altimeter to read the GPS altitude, even though the altimeter setting is not what is reported? * fly the altimeter set at reported conditions, have my Mode C report accurately, but run the risk of being off VFR altitude? Thanks -- WhenTurtlesFly Everyone in the airspace should be flying with reference to the (correctly set) altimeter and you should too. The fact that you may know your exact altitude by other means is not relevant when you're cruising en route to somewhere -- the idea behind using the same reference instrument is traffic avoidance. You'll have a measure of the altimeter's accuracy when you're at an airport and set the altimeter to the local barometric pressure. As best I remember, the altimeter should be within 75 feet of the reported field elevation -- be sure you know the field elevation where your airplane is, airports are mostly not level, and the minor changes in field elevation can eat into your error budget. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Where to post questions?
Jim Logajan writes:
His new portable would almost certainly use WAAS when available and would not be off by 500 ft. WAAS is independent of GPS. It's one of many GPS augmentation schemes. WAAS is accurate to 25 ft vertically 95% of the time. Standard aneroid altimeter have no adjustment for changes from non-standard temperature. A temp difference of ~4 degrees Celsius from standard atmosphere would show a 500 ft difference. So if you depend on your WAAS GPS for altitude, you might collide with traffic that is depending on barometric altitude. Which is why WAAS was developed. WAAS was developed to improve GPS accuracy overall, not to allow GPS to replace traditional barometric altimeters. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Where to post questions?
Jim Logajan wrote:
Mxsmanic wrote: WhenTurtlesFly writes: 'Cause I have one- Filed to cruise at 8500. Two GPS's (old simple one in the plane and my new portable) say I'm at 8500, but pressure altimeter says I'm at 8000. I of course set my altimeter to departing airport elevation, which should calibrate it to current pressure and nonstandard temperature, right? Do I... * fly what seems to be accurate and correct readouts on both of my GPS's? Then risk my altimeter being off and my Mode C reporting incorrectly... No. The altimeter is more accurate than the GPS units. The fact that the two GPS units agree simply means that they are both subject to the same error when operating in the same place at the same time. His new portable would almost certainly use WAAS when available and would not be off by 500 ft. * fly GPS's and adjust altimeter to read the GPS altitude, even though the altimeter setting is not what is reported? No. The altimeter is more accurate than the GPS units. WAAS is accurate to 25 ft vertically 95% of the time. Standard aneroid altimeter have no adjustment for changes from non-standard temperature. A temp difference of ~4 degrees Celsius from standard atmosphere would show a 500 ft difference. The temperature correction is affected by height. The rot is 4 feet per thousand feet for each degree C of difference from standard. A 500 ft difference at 4 degrees would only be true at 30,000 feet. So at my 250 foot high airport, it would have to be -35C to get my altimeter to be 50 feet high. I don't think I've ever seen it more than 20 feet off when set to the broadcast setting on the ground. * fly the altimeter set at reported conditions, have my Mode C report accurately, but run the risk of being off VFR altitude? Yes. Fly the altimeter. The risk of being 500 feet off is virtually nil if you've set the altimeter correctly to begin with. GPS provides very poor vertical accuracy compared to a barometric altimeter. GPS is designed for lateral accuracy rather than vertical accuracy. Which is why WAAS was developed. -- Don Poitras |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Where to post questions?
Mxsmanic wrote:
Jim Logajan writes: His new portable would almost certainly use WAAS when available and would not be off by 500 ft. WAAS is independent of GPS. It's one of many GPS augmentation schemes. WAAS cannot simultaneously be independent of GPS and an augmentation of it. Only the second of your two quoted sentences is accurate in any useful way. While your conclusion that he should use the altimeter set to the nearest station setting was correct, the rationale leading up to it was based on an invalid premise. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for all the thoughtful replies! Somewhat gratifying to know there is some discussion over my confusion.
I'll fly altimeter and hope everyone else is equally off (until the airliner comes by with the radar altimeter...) |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
First post | birdog[_2_] | Piloting | 8 | May 6th 10 10:31 PM |
P-40 2nd post | Phil Rhodes | Aviation Photos | 3 | March 27th 07 07:09 PM |
Another OT post, but you're not alone! | Jim Burns | Piloting | 10 | October 26th 06 01:59 AM |
Mig-29 questions & general aviation questions 2003 | Steven | Military Aviation | 1 | October 20th 03 06:06 AM |
Seven Questions For Michael Moore from a Blogger (was Questions for Mr. Bush, from Michael Moore) | Jim Yanik | Military Aviation | 2 | October 9th 03 09:36 PM |