![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It came up in another forum that O'Douls ( a non-alcoholic beer ) is not
truly non-alcoholic, but rather it's less then .5%. A reference to a http://www.drugs.indiana.edu/publica...ne/lowalc.html tells more and points out that these types of beverages are not considered alcoholic beverages. The FAR in question is § 91.17 Alcohol or drugs. (a) No person may act or attempt to act as a crewmember of a civil aircraft -- (1) Within 8 hours after the consumption of any alcoholic beverage; (2) While under the influence of alcohol; which uses the term alcoholic beverage to describe the prohibited item rather then consumption of alcohol as the item to be prohibited. So the $64,000 is, is the consumption of 1 O'Douls a violation of 91.17 (a) (1). While it may be considered splitting hairs, the FARs are quite adept at that and so are the FAA lawyers. MANDATORY WARNING: This is not a attempt to boost the sales or usage of Non-Alcoholic beers, I'm just curious. John Theune |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|