A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Proposal Shifts Command of ATC Workforce to the Military.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old October 28th 03, 01:47 PM
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Proposal Shifts Command of ATC Workforce to the Military.


This sounds like a bad idea to me:


-------------------------------------------------------------------
AVflash Volume 9, Number 44a October 26, 2003
------------------------------------------------------------------

With the House and Senate (not to mention Republicans and Democrats)
still wrangling over language about privatization in that FAA funding
bill, a bit more fuel was added to the fire last week. Rep. John Mica
(R-Fla.), chair of the House Aviation Subcommittee, proposed shifting
command of the air traffic control workforce to the military. Mica
plans to hold a hearing Nov. 6 to discuss the possibility. National
Air Traffic Controllers Association (NATCA) President John Carr said
Mica's idea "recognizes the inherently governmental function of air
traffic control, although we believe the military's priority should be
military air traffic control, not civilian," Congress Daily reported
last Wednesday. However, such a move would prevent air traffic
controllers from joining a union, according to Congress Daily. Carr
also expressed concern that a military currently fighting the war on
terror in Iraq and Afghanistan may already be spread too thin to take
on the responsibility of the domestic air traffic control system. Of
course, it goes without saying that NATCA would oppose any move that
would eliminate union representation for the controllers. "We think we
should stick with the system we have now," NATCA spokesman Doug Church
told AVweb over the weekend. "It's the best system in the world."


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CNO wants more skilled, efficient Navy workforce Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 January 5th 05 11:05 PM
Boeing Boondoggle Larry Dighera Military Aviation 77 September 15th 04 02:39 AM
POINTER to proposal in us.config Henrietta K Thomas Military Aviation 0 January 14th 04 08:37 AM
POINTER to proposal in us.config Henrietta K Thomas Naval Aviation 0 January 14th 04 08:37 AM
Re-Engine B-52 proposal. (I love this debate) CFA3 Military Aviation 17 July 13th 03 08:53 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.