![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Listening to channel nine on UA 1225 Denver-Reno yesterday, I heard
something like: "Denver Center, Jackpot 123, can we request a block allocation for 39 to 41?" and then "Jackpot 123, Denver Center, block allocation 39 to 41 approved." ["Jackpot 123" is made-up name since I don't remember actual name; maybe it was "block assignment" instead of "allocation"; and I don't recall if the wording was "Flight levels 39 to 41" or just the numbers.] Anyway, I'm assuming that "Jackpot 1243" wanted to move up and down freely between 39,000 and 41,000 feet seeking smoothest ride and best fuel economy without having to make repeated requests; and Denver Center was willing to approve this since nobody else was up that high anyway. Is that likely the case? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New "Rhinos" on the block (& farewell to low-viz) | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 0 | November 25th 04 08:24 AM |
B-2 question | Harley W Daugherty | Military Aviation | 37 | August 27th 04 12:45 AM |
Block out someone? (Little Hitler) | Jeff | Military Aviation | 6 | April 13th 04 07:03 PM |
More Info on Block 52 F-16 | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 0 | November 18th 03 03:07 PM |
French block airlift of British troops to Basra | Michael Petukhov | Military Aviation | 202 | October 24th 03 06:48 PM |