![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am interested in finding out what the current state of the art is
regarding automated VISUAL detection of mid-air collision threats. "Active" tech to avoid collisons such as devices that signal other devices with position, speed, heading, etc. work well, but require that everyone have the same or similar installed in their aircraft and that those devices are turned on and working correctly. Passive tech would not depend on the other guy's tech at all. Machine vision and the technologies that comprise it are advancing rapidly, getting cheaper. Fast processing and sensitive, high resolution imaging are available and relatively cheap. Software to resolve the perceived threats, Flarm software, already exists. I just saw a TED video of a machine that could track flying mosquitos and shoot them down with a laser (I want one of those). So, why don't we have electronic eyeballs watching out for traffic for us? Yes, I understand that it might take more than one to cover the full sphere around the aircraft. Some small amount of poking around on the net has yielded not too much info. I am thinking that some of y'all technically astute types that populate this group would know more. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Collision Avoidance | K | Soaring | 8 | September 5th 12 07:36 PM |
FS Zaon MRX Collision Avoidance | bumper[_4_] | Soaring | 4 | January 25th 12 05:08 AM |
Collision Avoidance and ATC | Bubba | Soaring | 5 | September 1st 06 04:31 AM |
Collision avoidance equipment | samcapt | Products | 2 | May 13th 05 04:41 PM |
Collision avoidance device | Jim Hendrix | Soaring | 1 | October 19th 04 09:24 AM |