![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Does anybody know how to mathmatically tell where the balance point should be on a NACA 63-015 airfoil? On a single number NACA airfoil, like NACA 0012, the number represents the balance point in percent from the big end. With two number airfoils, how do you figure it out? Is it 15% from the big end, 63% from the small end, or something else all together? Does anybody know? Dennis H. Dennis Hawkins n4mwd AT amsat DOT org (humans know what to do) "A RECESSION is when you know somebody who is out of work. A DEPRESSION is when YOU are out of work. A RECOVERY is when all the H-1B's are out of work." To find out what an H-1B is and how Congress is using them to put Americans out of work, visit the following web site and click on the "Exporting America" CNN news video: http://zazona.com/ShameH1B/MediaClips.htm |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... Does anybody know how to mathmatically tell where the balance point should be on a NACA 63-015 airfoil? On a single number NACA airfoil, like NACA 0012, the number represents the balance point in percent from the big end. With two number airfoils, how do you figure it out? Is it 15% from the big end, 63% from the small end, or something else all together? Does anybody know? Dennis H. Dennis Hawkins n4mwd AT amsat DOT org (humans know what to do) Dennis.. For starters, the NACA0012 doesn't necessarily balance at 12% of chord from anywhere. It is a full symettric airfoil that is 12% THICK. The numbers have very very little to do with balance points. I suggest you read up on what the numbers mean. I'll look for a good book BUT "THEORY OF AIRFIL SECTIONS" is a good place to start. Scott Scott. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
Does anybody know how to mathmatically tell where the balance point should be on a NACA 63-015 airfoil? On a single number NACA airfoil, like NACA 0012, the number represents the balance point in percent from the big end. With two number airfoils, how do you figure it out? Is it 15% from the big end, 63% from the small end, or something else all together? Does anybody know? Dennis H. Dennis Hawkins n4mwd AT amsat DOT org (humans know what to do) "A RECESSION is when you know somebody who is out of work. A DEPRESSION is when YOU are out of work. A RECOVERY is when all the H-1B's are out of work." To find out what an H-1B is and how Congress is using them to put Americans out of work, visit the following web site and click on the "Exporting America" CNN news video: http://zazona.com/ShameH1B/MediaClips.htm The center of gravity of the airfoil section can be calculated, but there is very little point in that. In the ideal case, 3 points should be the same: The center of gravity, the aerodynamic centre, and the structural centre (don't know what it is called exactly in english, but it is the point where you can apply a force without causing a torque as well). At least, that is what I have learned. For symmetrical airfoils this is definitely true, but for curved airfoils this would mean that there is still an aerodynamic torque in the blade. The aerodynamic centre can be calculated from the airfoil lift and moment curves and is usually located near 25% of the chord. It is also important in stability: If the centre of gravity is before this point , the configuration is stable (like an arrow that will point its point in the direction it flies) and if the centre of gravity is after this point, it is unstable (hint: a piece of paper from your printer has its centre of gravity at 50%. Watch how it flies...) This means that blade manufacturers will normally put a balance weight in the nose of the blade or make the rear hollow (or both) Best regards, Dikkie Dik |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
um...MAC...Mean aerodynamic chord?
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
General Zinni on Sixty Minutes | WalterM140 | Military Aviation | 428 | July 1st 04 11:16 PM |
Naval Air Refueling Needs Deferred in Air Force Tanker Plan | Henry J Cobb | Military Aviation | 47 | May 22nd 04 03:36 AM |
Did the Germans have the Norden bombsight? | Cub Driver | Military Aviation | 106 | May 12th 04 07:18 AM |
How fast should an ADF point? | Ben Jackson | Instrument Flight Rules | 6 | November 21st 03 03:50 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |