A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » Aviation Images » Aviation Photos
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Is it just me, or are airliners slower than they used to be?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old May 2nd 15, 03:43 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Andrew Chaplin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 728
Default Is it just me, or are airliners slower than they used to be?

"Byker" wrote in
:

The average Southwest flight only travels 653 miles for an average of
one hour and 55 minutes

Fortunately Airbus and Boeing have both remembered how important speed
is and this is reflected in their latest models where .85 Mach seems to
be the minimum standard cruise speed.

A lot better than the 'bad old days' of the 737 'Classic' 300, 400 and
500 series which crawled along at an agonizing .74 Mach, with their
accompanying terrible ride in turbulence a long flight into a headwind
was like cruel and unusual punishment.

That's an interesting datapoint.

I speculate here, but perhaps back in the day the "senior" models (707,
747, DC-8) got the more refined "cruise wing", while "junior" models
like the 737 Jurassic were seen to only do rather short flights where
higher mach numbers were not seen as important. And so the wing was
optimized more for shorter runways and less for cruise speeds. And then
the 737 started doing 4+ hour flights. Aaaarrrgh...

Again, just a thought I'm having. No hard data to support it.

Thankfully nowadays supercritical wing profiles and so forth ensure you
can get both M0.85 and decent field performance. A far cry from those
gorgeous, sharp 60s wings like on the DC-8, but it works.


The Convair 880 cruised at .89 Mach and the 990 a little faster, but they
could not compete with Douglas and Boeing.
--
Andrew Chaplin
SIT MIHI GLADIUS SICUT SANCTO MARTINO
(If you're going to e-mail me, you'll have to get "yourfinger." out.)
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
3D Airliners a320_db.jpg (1/1) J.F. Aviation Photos 0 October 30th 07 12:25 PM
3D Airliners AGL6.jpg (1/1) J.F. Aviation Photos 0 October 30th 07 12:25 PM
3D Airliners 787_AC_800.jpg (1/1) J.F. Aviation Photos 0 October 30th 07 12:25 PM
airliners.net down?? Freezing Marvin General Aviation 2 June 25th 04 11:14 PM
121.5 & Airliners Nolaminar Soaring 19 November 20th 03 07:35 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.