![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The lack of respect for the PW-5 has little to do with looks or performance.
It shares the same fate as NHRA Pro Stock Trucks do. A great cost saving idea that was abandoned by the promoter after they changed their minds on how good an idea it was. So when the FAI didn't put World Class in the world championships, the class folded, leaving a bunch of one design guys no place to play. Now I think that World Class would go over well if you got to fly for the big money, like Open,18, 15 and Standard do. I really think that the PW-5 community got screwed by having the Promoters back away from the class after the birds/tooling got made. Now is it fast, no Is it pretty, no Is it 40-1, no You can always buy more bird for the buck with an obsolete Std or 15mtr ship, but you end up in the same boat. A nice flying airplane that is uncompetitive in un-handicapped contests but great for badge flying. At least the gel-cost isn't falling off of em......... But it begs one other question. Why aren't you guys ragging on the other low performance gasbags that have no legs, aren't 40-1 and have warts? I see a nice little plane being trashed because it isn't a way to measure anatomical size. Look at it for what it is, a plane for 80% of the soaring pilots that don't fly far from home and like to stay up in the local area. Scott |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|