![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've used a 295 for aviation purposes since it came out and a Street
Pilot III for auto trips. Recently, issues developed with reestablishing the update chain for the SP III road map software. So, I decided to upgrade to a 296, which does "trains, planes, and automobiles." (Actually, aviation, automotive, and marine). What a awesome unit! So much better than the 295 and soooooo much faster than the SP III when doing automotive routes and recalculations. The "TAWS" mode alone is worth the price of admission. I ran the Henderson/NASCAR King Air CFIT crash in the simulation mode. There was plenty of warning from the 296 along that track and at their presumed altitude. Even if their altitude changed once the TRACON lost radar, they still would have received timely warnings. Also, with the situational awareness affored by the map (this is true of the 295 as well) they probably wouldn't have gone where they went. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Amateur Review of the Garmin GPSMAP 296 GPS | Rhett | Piloting | 10 | March 23rd 05 01:16 AM |
Pirep: Garmin GPSMAP 296 versus 295. (very long) | Jon Woellhaf | Piloting | 12 | September 4th 04 11:55 PM |
Amateur Review of the Garmin GPSMAP 296 GPS | Rhett | Products | 10 | April 29th 04 06:57 AM |
Garmin DME arc weidnress | Dave Touretzky | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | October 2nd 03 02:04 AM |
Garmin 90 Database Updates Discontinued | Val Christian | Piloting | 14 | August 20th 03 09:32 PM |