A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Departure/Enroute RAIM



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old September 2nd 05, 01:56 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Departure/Enroute RAIM

A chart change notice (and a similar Jeppesen briefing bulletin) were
sent to all subscribers in the past few weeks setting forth the new Type
A or B requirements for RNAV OPDs, SIDs, and RNAV routes.

The practical aspect for light aircraft equipped with either TSO 129 or
146 boxes is that a terminal RAIM check must not be accomplished before
using an RNAV ODP. And, if the aircraft can get into the low flight
levels and use a Q Route, then a predictive RAIM check must be made.

This is all dependent upon whether any of the GPS birds are inoperative,
the determination of which places a significant new burden on the light
aircraft IFR pilot using IFR GPS.

AOPA just issued a bulletin on the subject, which I feel really glosses
over the issues raised by all of this.

http://www.aopa.org/whatsnew/newsite...50901rnav.html

These requirements became effective yesterday.

Does anyone know how to do a predictive RAIM check with a 129 box? What
is required for using an RNAV ODP, a perdictive RAIM check or an actual
terminal RAIM check at departure time? How is a terminal RAIM check
accomplished (as opposed to an approach RAIM check, which is easy to do,
but perhaps overly restrictive).

Anyone understand this stuff? I know I am confused.

I suppose most non-commercial operators will be able to just press on
and just fly the ODP. No doubt it will be just as safe post-Sept 1st as
it was before. But, eventually some inspector, designee, or CFI-I doing
an ICC is going to make an applicant do a rug dance over this new stuff.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RAIM errors and the Apollo GPS Lee Elson Instrument Flight Rules 4 July 13th 04 03:12 PM
RAIM? Roy Smith Instrument Flight Rules 25 June 10th 04 03:40 PM
Violating Airspace with GPS John Bell Piloting 57 November 5th 03 08:25 PM
RAIM Prediction Barry Instrument Flight Rules 9 October 4th 03 03:39 AM
Big News -- WAAS GPS is Operational for IFR Lockheed employee Instrument Flight Rules 87 July 30th 03 02:08 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.