![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The article below is printed (in its entirety) in the current issue of AOPA Pilot magazine. In it, Rod Machado mentions the controls being "mechanically sticky." It has been my experience, that the bar attached to the control yoke which goes through a bushing in the control panel often binds as it moves fore and aft through its entire range of travel as it might during a landing flare. This stickiness can cause an unexpected balloon leading to pilot induced oscillations. As part of the Piper PA28 annual inspection lubricating the bar attached to the control yoke with engine oils is mentioned. I have found that this lubrication is often overlooked, and most rental aircraft suffer to a greater of lesser extent from sticky elevator controls as a result. Has anyone else experienced this? -------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.aopa.org/members/files/pi.../ltol0509.html License to Learn Arms control: A case for the two-handed flare BY ROD MACHADO (From AOPA Pilot, September 2005.) .... The truth is that humans, like cats, find it harder to hold onto things as they age. A hood, however, isn't one of those things. Instead, we often struggle to sustain a grip on the ideas we once held in our youth. For me, this involved believing that it was never proper to flare an airplane with both hands on the yoke. Unlike my cat, I hope, you will at least consider the following discourse without stomping off in a huff and refusing to speak to me for days, or longer. Why would anyone want to flare an airplane with two hands on a typical "wheel type" yoke instead of keeping one hand on the throttle? Ask a handyman and often he'll profess that it gives him better control of the landing flare, allowing a much smoother touchdown. There's a good reason for this, too. Let's call it the Big Bang theory. In Westerns, you always see the hero shooting from the hip, with one hand. In reality, police officers are taught to fire a gun with two hands on the weapon. Why? It provides improved control and precision, and enhances the chances of hitting what they're aiming at. These are all things I think most pilots would be happy to have on their side when shooting for smoother, more controlled contact with the runway. Biomechanically, it's simply easier to apply precise changes in elevator control pressure when you dedicate additional strength and more nerve endings to manipulating the control yoke. Two hands also provide better leverage. This is why many pilots opt to place both hands on the yoke during steep turns. Using two hands also can help overcome any binds or crimps in the yoke's gearing mechanism, a common issue in older airplanes. It's very important to understand that I'm speaking of using two hands only in the flare (not the roundout), and only when the engine is at flight idle and certainly not when the airplane is more than a foot or so above the runway. The fact is that some folks like to flare with two hands. Fine. Given this preference, is there any risk that might outweigh the benefit of more precise elevator control when one hand is moved to the throttle and power applied during the flare? Let's see. As a young CFI, I was adamant about my primary students keeping one hand on the yoke and the other on the throttle during the landing flare. I still am. This is simply good practice, given that students may not have enough practical experience to locate the throttle by feel or spatial memory. On the other hand, I also insisted (long ago) that my advanced students do the same. Most willingly complied, but a few seemed quite insistent about using two hands to flare. When I recall the wholesome and playful discussions inspired by my request, the phrase "over my dead body" vaguely comes to mind (a response that, at the time, seemed more prescient than playful). It turned out that many of the people preferring a two-handed flare flew larger single-engine airplanes such as the Cessna 210 and Piper Cherokee Six. The handy use of two hands for the flare helped these pilots manipulate elevators (yokes) with greater precision in pitch control for any number of good reasons. Most likely, the controls were aerodynamically heavy, mechanically sticky, or the pilot's seating position provided for insufficient leverage on the yoke. Unfortunately, as a young instructor I was sure that the only way to fly an airplane was to do it the way I was taught, which didn't involve having two hands on the wheel. For those students refusing assimilation, I often swung the unforgiving blade of knowledge to untether them from the notion that a two-handed flare was a safe practice. "What would happen during the flare if you encountered a gust, or heaven forbid, wingtip vortices, and had to apply power immediately?" I asked, rattling my mighty saber. ... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Laser Flare Signaling Device | C J Campbell | Piloting | 2 | March 18th 05 03:08 PM |
Tamed by the Tailwheel | [email protected] | Piloting | 84 | January 18th 05 04:08 PM |
Wheelbarrowing and Flare | Ramapriya | Piloting | 39 | January 2nd 05 03:32 AM |
37 degree flare, 1/8" stainless | Richard Riley | Home Built | 8 | August 29th 03 04:21 AM |
MK 80 flare pictures wanted | mah | Naval Aviation | 2 | August 6th 03 03:18 PM |