![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There was a thread recently where this was briefly discussed, though I
can't seem to quite find it now. On AOPA's web site, they talk a bit about how the feds do try to levy stiff penalties on people whom intentionally misrepresents facts on the medical, if they're caught. (And they indicate that simple oversights can usually be cleared up with some additional work and talking with people before it snowballs.) http://www.aopa.org/whatsnew/newsite...29medical.html Apparently, they (los federales) generally save revocation for intentional falsification if found in aftermath of an accident or incident, and suspension if less serious. I certainly understand why pilots generally feel they don't volunteer anything not explicitly asked for -- reasonable enough, given how things works in the real world. Just make sure one doesn't misrepresent any materially important fact, I guess. -Dan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFI without commercial? | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 75 | December 8th 10 04:17 PM |
Question about medical certificate and Zyban... | [email protected] | Piloting | 27 | July 28th 05 03:57 PM |
Student Pilot Who Gets 5 Months for Lying on His Application for Medical | [email protected] | Home Built | 2 | June 30th 05 03:00 AM |
Question Medical | Captain Wubba | Piloting | 5 | June 11th 04 05:12 AM |
Question on medical and kidney stones | nospam | Piloting | 13 | November 8th 03 07:10 AM |