![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've been flying my 12m Silent-IN all by mysel up in Northern Maine.
I'm finding conditions are usually marginal. 5kts is the best I've ever seen on the very best day. Typically I see 2-3kts and real scratchy at that. I often run into a kind of lift (particullarly up near the cloud decks) where the lifts comes on gradually, then crashendo's and crashes behind it. It doesn't feel like a typical thermal. It feels more like some kind of mechanical turbulance or a sheer wall. In other regions I've flown (Eastern Washington State) lift blew the caps off vario and it wanted to shooved you right through bottom of the cloud. Here (Northern Maine) it's just so weak I can barely make it to the decks, then this "sheer lift" forms and I can't stay in lift long enough to make good progress. A plausable technical description of what I've observed would really help me visualize the phenom and maybe fly it better. Thanks, Bruce Meacham |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
I can definately identify with the horizontal turbulence phenomina that this discusses. But what I'm talking about is not the same. I've approached this stable at min-sink and identified lift with the altemeter. Then the vario rises quickly for about 2 second, then the bottom drops out and I'm in heavy sink I'm wondering if the shape/behavior of a thermal changes as it matures and approaches a cloud (aka tops out)? -Bruce Read Mike Borgelt's article: http://www.borgeltinstruments.com/Gusts.html -- Regards, Adrian Jansen sounds like wave, have you tried exploring straight lines, across the wind etc? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bruce,
Absolutely, practically all characteristics of a thermal change rapidly as it approaches the boundary layer, which is not always the same as cloud base. (I'm not an expert on this subject, but I believe you could call it a mere coincidence if the top of the lift is the same as cloudbase.) We have many days out west where the top of the lift will be several thousand feet below cloudbase, but when there's enough moisture in the air and the dewpoint is low enough, cloudbase will be below the top of the lift, in which case you have to be most careful not go get sucked into the clouds. A well known German pilot whose name is escaping me at the moment (not Reichmann) wrote several articles on thermal characteristics, one of them is in the "Going farther and faster" books that you can purchase from the Australian gliding federation. (Other RASers can hopefully reply with those details.) The books are highly recommended for newbies, and the stuff on thermals is quite informative. ~ted/2NO ps the GFA web page where you can buy the books is he http://www.gfa.org.au/sales/index.php#books. If Google mangles that address, just Google for their web page, it's easy to find. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doh! Ingo Renner, of course. Somebody please tell me his secret for
centering thermals in a single turn! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "phil collin" wrote in message ... wrote: I can definately identify with the horizontal turbulence phenomina that this discusses. But what I'm talking about is not the same. I've approached this stable at min-sink and identified lift with the altemeter. Then the vario rises quickly for about 2 second, then the bottom drops out and I'm in heavy sink The shear zone near the edges of thermals will create horizontal vorticies. If you fly through one of these shear vortices at right angles, and the vortex is rotating the top away from your flight path, you will experience what you described. First, you will experience smoothly increasing lift, then as you pass through the vortex core, a sharp transition to strong sink which will smoothly decrease. These are commonly encountered when working small, strong thermal cores since you are spending a lot of time in the shear zone. A low boyancy/shear ratio can also create them. Just keep circling and watch your averager. Bill Daniels |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
I can definately identify with the horizontal turbulence phenomina that this discusses. But what I'm talking about is not the same. I've approached this stable at min-sink and identified lift with the altemeter. Then the vario rises quickly for about 2 second, then the bottom drops out and I'm in heavy sink I'm wondering if the shape/behavior of a thermal changes as it matures and approaches a cloud (aka tops out)? -Bruce Read Mike Borgelt's article: http://www.borgeltinstruments.com/Gusts.html -- Regards, Adrian Jansen Yes, as others have pointed out, this has been well explored. Certainly you can imagine that the vertical airstream has to become horizontal near the thermal top, else you still go up. And so you get horizontal wind gusts, leading to the vario effects. In fact if you are flying outward from the centre, you get a tail wind, which corresponds to heavy sink on the vario. And of course you still get patches of vertical motion as well, so the altimeter registers too. Things are never simple. -- Regards, Adrian Jansen adrianjansen at internode dot on dot net Design Engineer J & K Micro Systems Microcomputer solutions for industrial control Note reply address is invalid, convert address above to machine form. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Are you sure you are circling tight enough? It may be that the thermal
cores are very narrow, and you are not getting into them. You may have experienced larger thermals out west, and could circle in them without banking that much. Try making a small right angle bend out of solid wire, and mount it up on the panel so it shows a 45 degree angle like a letter-v (you may have seen something similar on an aerobatic airplane). Use it as a reference with the horizon to see if you really are banking at 45 degrees in a tight thermal. You may be surprised to learn that what you thought was 45 degrees was only 30 or so. It's a very common problem. Other things to check are your vario TE compensation, and tubing leaks. It may also be instructive to carry a logger and analyze the flight traces with a flight ananlysis program like SeeYou or StrePla. wrote: I've been flying my 12m Silent-IN all by mysel up in Northern Maine. I'm finding conditions are usually marginal. 5kts is the best I've ever seen on the very best day. Typically I see 2-3kts and real scratchy at that. I often run into a kind of lift (particullarly up near the cloud decks) where the lifts comes on gradually, then crashendo's and crashes behind it. It doesn't feel like a typical thermal. It feels more like some kind of mechanical turbulance or a sheer wall. In other regions I've flown (Eastern Washington State) lift blew the caps off vario and it wanted to shooved you right through bottom of the cloud. Here (Northern Maine) it's just so weak I can barely make it to the decks, then this "sheer lift" forms and I can't stay in lift long enough to make good progress. A plausable technical description of what I've observed would really help me visualize the phenom and maybe fly it better. Thanks, Bruce Meacham |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Doug Haluza" wrote in message oups.com... Try making a small right angle bend out of solid wire, and mount it up on the panel so it shows a 45 degree angle like a letter-v (you may have seen something similar on an aerobatic airplane). Use it as a reference with the horizon to see if you really are banking at 45 degrees in a tight thermal. You may be surprised to learn that what you thought was 45 degrees was only 30 or so. It's a very common problem. In a glider with a reasonably supine seating position I use the instrument mounting screws as a 45 degree reference. It's not so easy to do in a glider where you're sitting up more because the instruments aren't so near the horizon. Stephen |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
YES! This is it! The thermal flattenning makes good sense. It may be
some kind of wave.. Nearest mountain to me is occationally up-wind, but 75 miles away , Mt. Katahdin (5,100'). This was a very windy day (30kts at altitude) and they where from the mountains... but that phenomina was too weak to ride 1-2kts coming in, 5kt peak, then boom -8kts ![]() As for the circle tightness... 12m Silent aint no ballasted speed deamon. It's a light (290kg gross) ship with a 33kt stall speed and 1.36kt min-sink. It's really a Sunday thermal machine. It's also a self launch and I have it all to myself, so I've been flying quite a bit lately. I have a bit over 15 soaring hours just this spring (35hrs TT-G). I've gotten pretty good at keeping it up on marginal days. I commonly ride the stall buffet (Vs+10kts) in a 60 degree bank satisfied with 1kt average lift just to stay up a little longer. I did 6.1hrs last week on a day that the vario never saw anything over 4kts and typically 1-2kts. This kind of weather sucks for x-country cause there's rarely enough strong lift to know I'll get home. On stronger days I have done some "near" x-country... Headed to two nearby airport 15miles away in a right triangle from home. But those where really just "circle-up and slide-on-home deals", very few real risks. Highest climb: 7,000' from a 1,500' shut-down. But I had to really milk the last 1,500'. For a newby... I think I'm holding my own. Thank you all for the good info. I read it all and I'll look for the book. -Bruce Bill Daniels wrote: "phil collin" wrote in message ... wrote: I can definately identify with the horizontal turbulence phenomina that this discusses. But what I'm talking about is not the same. I've approached this stable at min-sink and identified lift with the altemeter. Then the vario rises quickly for about 2 second, then the bottom drops out and I'm in heavy sink The shear zone near the edges of thermals will create horizontal vorticies. If you fly through one of these shear vortices at right angles, and the vortex is rotating the top away from your flight path, you will experience what you described. First, you will experience smoothly increasing lift, then as you pass through the vortex core, a sharp transition to strong sink which will smoothly decrease. These are commonly encountered when working small, strong thermal cores since you are spending a lot of time in the shear zone. A low boyancy/shear ratio can also create them. Just keep circling and watch your averager. Bill Daniels |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Theories of lift | Avril Poisson | General Aviation | 3 | April 28th 06 07:20 AM |
Lift Query | Avril Poisson | General Aviation | 8 | April 21st 05 07:50 PM |
Tamed by the Tailwheel | [email protected] | Piloting | 84 | January 18th 05 04:08 PM |
New theory of flight released Sept 2004 | Mark Oliver | Piloting | 70 | October 10th 04 10:50 PM |
thermal lift | ekantian | Soaring | 0 | October 5th 04 02:55 PM |